首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >A Geospatial Analysis of Freestanding and Hospital Emergency Department Accessibility via Public Transit
【24h】

A Geospatial Analysis of Freestanding and Hospital Emergency Department Accessibility via Public Transit

机译:通过公共交通对独立和医院急诊科的可及性进行地理空间分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) are an important source of care for underserved populations and represent a significant part of the social safety net. In order to explore the effect of freestanding emergency departments (FSED) on access to care for urban underserved populations, we performed a geospatial analysis comparing the proximity of FSEDs and hospital EDs to public transit lines in three United States (U.S.) metropolitan areas: Houston, Denver, and Cleveland.Methods: We used publicly available U.S. Census data, public transportation maps obtained from regional transit authorities, and geocoded FSED and hospital ED locations. Euclidean distance from each FSED and hospital ED to the nearest public transit line was calculated in ArcGIS. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of an FSED, relative to a hospital ED, being located within 0.5 miles (mi) of a public transit line using logistic regression, adjusting for population density and median household income and with error clustered at the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) level.Results: The median distance from FSEDs to public transit lines was significantly greater than from hospital EDs across all three markets. In Houston, Denver, and Cleveland, the median distance between FSEDs and public transit lines was greater than from hospital EDs by 1.0 mi, 0.2 mi, and 1.6 mi, respectively. The OR of a public transit line being located within 0.5 mi of an FSED, as compared with a hospital ED, across all three MSAs was 0.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13–0.34) unadjusted and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11–0.40) adjusted for population density and median household income.Conclusion: In comparison with hospital EDs, FSEDs are located farther from public transit lines and are less likely to be within walking distance of public transportation. These findings suggest that FSEDs are unlikely to directly increase access to care for patients without private means of transportation. Further research is necessary to explore both the direct and indirect impact of FSEDs on access to care, potentially through effects on hospital ED crowding and overall healthcare expenditures, as well as the ultimate role and responsibility of FSEDs in improving access to care for underserved populations.
机译:简介:急诊科(ED)是服务不足的人群的重要护理来源,并且是社会安全网的重要组成部分。为了探究独立急诊部门(FSED)对服务不足的城市居民获得医疗服务的影响,我们进行了地理空间分析,比较了FSED和医院ED与三个美国大都市区的公共交通线路的接近程度:休斯敦方法:我们使用了公开提供的美国人口普查数据,从区域运输当局获得的公共交通地图以及经过地理编码的FSED和医院ED位置。在ArcGIS中计算了从每个FSED和医院ED到最近的公共交通线的欧几里得距离。我们使用logistic回归,人口密度和家庭收入中位数进行了调整,并对误差进行了聚类分析,从而计算了FSED与医院ED的比值比(OR),该比值位于公交线路的0.5英里(mi)之内结果:在所有三个市场中,FSED到公交线路的中位距离明显大于医院ED的中位距离。在休斯顿,丹佛和克利夫兰,FSED与公共交通线路之间的中位距离分别比从医院ED的中位距离大1.0英里,0.2英里和1.6英里。与医院ED相比,公共交通线路与医院ED之间的OR值在所有三个MSA中均为未经调整的0.21(95%置信区间[CI],0.13-0.34)和0.20(95%CI,人口密度和家庭收入中位数进行了0.11-0.40)的结论。结论:与医院EDs相比,FSEDs距离公交线路更远,步行距离之内也不太可能。这些发现表明,FSED不太可能直接增加没有私人交通工具的患者获得护理的机会。有必要进行进一步的研究,以探索FSED对获得医疗服务的直接和间接影响,可能通过对医院ED拥挤和整体医疗保健支出的影响,以及FSED在改善服务不足人群的医疗服务中的最终作用和责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号