首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
【24h】

Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport

机译:直升机EMS运输前已插管患者的气管插管压

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Objectives Endotracheal intubation is a common intervention in critical care patients undergoing Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transportation. Measurement of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressures is not common practice in patients referred to our service. Animal studies have demonstrated an association between the pressure of the ETT cuff on the tracheal mucosa and decreased blood flow leading to mucosal ischemia and scarring. Cuff pressures greater than 30 cmH2O impede mucosal capillary blood flow. Multiple prior studies have recommended 30 cmH2O as the maximum safe cuff inflation pressure. This study sought to evaluate the inflation pressures in ETT cuffs of patients presenting to HEMS. Methods We enrolled a convenience sample of patients presenting to UMass Memorial LifeFlight who were intubated by the sending facility or Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency. Flight crews measured the ETT cuff pressures using a commercially available device. Those patients intubated by the flight crew were excluded from this analysis as the cuff was inflated with the manometer to a standardized pressure. Crews logged the results on a research form and the data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and an online statistical analysis tool. Results We analyzed data for 55 patients. There was a mean age of 57 years (range 18-90). The mean ETT cuff pressure was 70 (95% CI, 61-80) cmH2O. The mean lies 40 cmH2O above the maximum accepted value of 30 cmH2O (p120 cmH2O, the maximum pressure on the analog gauge. Conclusion Patients presenting to HEMS after intubation by the referral agency (EMS or hospital) have ETT cuffs inflated to pressures that are, on average, more than double the recommended maximum. These patients are at risk for tracheal mucosal injury and scarring from decreased mucosal capillary blood flow. Hospital and EMS providers should use ETT cuff manometry to ensure that they inflate ETT cuffs to safe pressures.
机译:研究目标气管插管是接受急救直升机运输的重症监护患者的常见干预措施。在向我们服务的患者中,气管插管(ETT)袖带压力的测量并不常见。动物研究表明,ETT袖带对气管粘膜的压力与导致粘膜缺血和瘢痕形成的血流量减少之间存在关联。袖带压力大于30 cmH2O会阻止粘膜毛细血管血流。多项先前的研究建议将30 cmH2O作为最大的安全袖带充气压力。这项研究试图评估就诊于HEMS患者的ETT袖带中的充气压力。方法我们收集了方便样本,这些样本是由发送机构或紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构插管的参加UMass Memorial LifeFlight的患者的。飞行人员使用市售设备测量ETT袖带压力。由于将袖带用压力计充气至标准压力,因此将那些由机组人员插管的患者排除在分析之外。克鲁斯将结果记录在研究表格中,并使用Microsoft Excel和在线统计分析工具对数据进行了分析。结果我们分析了55例患者的数据。平均年龄为57岁(范围18-90)。 ETT袖带平均压力为70(95%CI,61-80)cmH2O。平均数比最大接受值30 cmH2O(p120 cmH2O,模拟压力表的最大压力)高40 cmH2O。结论在转诊机构(EMS或医院)插管后出现HEMS的患者的ETT袖带充气至这些患者有气管粘膜损伤和因粘膜毛细血管血流减少而形成疤痕的风险,医院和EMS提供者应使用ETT袖套测压法确保将ETT袖套充气至安全压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号