...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary World >23. DNA extraction from hydatid cyst protoscolices: Comparison of five different methods
【24h】

23. DNA extraction from hydatid cyst protoscolices: Comparison of five different methods

机译:23.从包虫囊原细胞中提取DNA:五种不同方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The current study aimed to find out a simple, practical and high throughput DNA isolation method for extraction of DNA from hydatid cyst samples. Materials and Methods: Cattle and sheep isolate of hydatid cysts were obtained from the slaughterhouse, and hydatid fluid and protoscolices were collected in a sterile condition. Protoscolices were washed, 3 times with phosphate buffered saline, and DNA was extracted by different methods including manual extraction with freeze/thawing and phenol-chloroform, Triton X-100 extraction, and by a commercial kit (YTA, Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran) with three different modifications in the kit's manufacturer instructions. The obtained DNA from the different methods was evaluated by Nanodrop in terms of the yield of DNA and carbohydrates or protein contaminations. To compare the quality of the extracted DNA, two pieces of the mitochondrial genome of Echinococcus granulosus, cox1, and nad1, were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified, using each of the DNA prepared by different methods. Electrophoresis of PCR products was carried out on the agarose gel. Results: The DNA extracted by manual method, using phenol/chloroform, had the highest yield, yet with the highest level of protein and carbohydrate contamination. The DNA extracted using two-step incubations, initially at 60°C for 2 h and then overnight at 37°C, was the most purified DNA with the lowest rate of contamination. Conclusion: Findings of the study demonstrated that modification in the currently available commercially DNA extraction kit resulted in the development of a high throughput DNA isolation method. This method can be recommended for the extraction of DNA from hydatid cysts, especially the cattle isolate where the extraction of DNA in these samples are usually problematic.
机译:目的:本研究旨在寻找一种简单,实用和高通量的DNA分离方法,用于从包虫囊肿样品中提取DNA。材料与方法:从屠宰场中获得牛和羊的包虫囊肿分离物,并在无菌条件下收集包虫液和原生胶体。将原粘蛋白洗涤,用磷酸盐缓冲盐水洗涤3次,然后通过不同的方法提取DNA,包括用冷冻/解冻和苯酚-氯仿手工提取,Triton X-100提取以及商业试剂盒(YTA,Yekta Tajhiz Azma,伊朗)在套件的制造商说明中进行了三种不同的修改。通过Nanodrop评估了从不同方法获得的DNA的DNA和碳水化合物产量或蛋白质污染情况。为了比较提取的DNA的质量,使用通过不同方法制备的每种DNA,通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增了两个细粒棘球E虫线粒体基因组cox1和nad1。 PCR产物的电泳在琼脂糖凝胶上进行。结果:使用苯酚/氯仿手工提取的DNA产量最高,但蛋白质和碳水化合物的污染程度最高。使用两步温育(最初在60°C下2小时,然后在37°C下过夜)提取的DNA是纯度最高,污染率最低的DNA。结论:该研究的结果表明,对目前市售的DNA提取试剂盒进行的修饰导致了高通量DNA分离方法的发展。推荐使用该方法从包虫囊肿中提取DNA,尤其是牛分离株,因为这些样品中的DNA提取通常存在问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号