...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Improving the pre-screening of eligible patients in order to increase enrollment in cancer clinical trials
【24h】

Improving the pre-screening of eligible patients in order to increase enrollment in cancer clinical trials

机译:改善合格患者的预筛查,以增加癌症临床试验的人数

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The performance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is often hindered by recruitment difficulties. This study aims to explore the pre-screening phase of four prostate cancer RCTs to identify the impact of a systematic pre-selection of eligible patients for RCT recruitment. Methods The pre-screening of four RCTs opened at the Comprehensive Cancer Center in Rennes was analyzed retrospectively (French Genitourinary Tumor Group (GETUG) 14, 15, 16, and 17). Data were extracted from electronic multidisciplinary cancer (MDC) reports and manually completed by physicians and medical secretaries. These data were the main source of information for clinicians to discuss treatment alternatives during MDC sessions. The pre-screening decisions made by the clinicians during these MDC meetings were compared with those made after a systematic review of the MDC reports by a clinical research assistant (CRA). Any inconsistencies in decisions between the CRA and the MDC physicians were corrected by the principal investigator (PI). Results The pre-screening rate was 9.1% during the MDC meetings, while it was estimated to be 12.9% after the final review by the PI, and 29% after the systematic review by the CRA. The study showed that 77% and 67% of the MDC reports did not mention clinical and pathological Tumor, lymph node and metastasis classification of malignant tumors (TNM) staging, respectively, and that 35 of the CRA’s 47 proposals rejected by the PI concerned implicit information (not specified in the MDC reports). Only one patient was proposed by the PI, and none by the CRA. Conclusions These results confirm that pre-screening could be improved by a systematic review of the medical reports. They also highlight the fact that missing data in electronic MDC reports leads to over-enrollment of non-eligible patients, but not to over-exclusion of eligible patients. Thus, our study confirms the potential gain in using semi-automated pre-selection of MDC reports, in order to avoid missing out on patients eligible for RCTs. Trial registration The trials evaluated in this study were previously registered with clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT00104741 webcite on 3 March 2005; NCT00104715 webcite on 3 March 2005; NCT00423475 webcite on 16 January 2007; and NCT00667069 webcite on 24 April 2008).
机译:背景技术随机招募试验通常会阻碍随机对照试验(RCT)的开展。这项研究旨在探索四个前列腺癌RCT的预筛查阶段,以确定系统地预选合格患者进行RCT募集的影响。方法回顾性分析在雷恩综合癌症中心开设的四个RCT的预筛查(法国泌尿生殖泌尿肿瘤小组(GETUG)14、15、16和17)。数据是从电子多学科癌症(MDC)报告中提取的,并由医生和医务秘书手动完成。这些数据是临床医生在MDC会议期间讨论治疗方案的主要信息来源。将临床医生在这些MDC会议期间做出的预筛查决定与临床研究助理(CRA)对MDC报告进行系统审查后做出的决定进行了比较。主要研究者(PI)纠正了CRA和MDC医师之间的任何决策不一致。结果在MDC会议期间,预筛选率为9.1%,而PI最终审核后的预筛选率为12.9%,CRA系统审核后的预筛选率为29%。该研究表明,MDC报告中有77%和67%分别未提及恶性肿瘤(TNM)分期的临床和病理学肿瘤,淋巴结转移和转移分类,并且PI拒绝的CRA 47项提案中有35项暗示信息(在MDC报告中未指定)。 PI仅提议一名患者,而CRA未提议。结论这些结果证实,通过系统审查医学报告可以改善预筛查。他们还强调了这样一个事实,即电子MDC报告中的数据丢失会导致不符合条件的患者的入学率过高,但不会导致合格患者的过分排斥。因此,我们的研究证实了使用MDC报告的半自动预选的潜在收益,以避免错过符合RCT资格的患者。试验注册本研究中评估的试验先前已在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册(注册号:2005年3月3日为NCT00104741网站; 2005年3月3日为NCT00104715网站; 2007年1月16日为NCT00423475网站;以及2008年4月24日为NCT00667069网站)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号