...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Family Practice >Medication Allergy Documentation in Ambulatory Care: A Case Report of Errors and Missed Opportunities Quantified during the Unique Transition from Paper Records to Electronic Medical Records
【24h】

Medication Allergy Documentation in Ambulatory Care: A Case Report of Errors and Missed Opportunities Quantified during the Unique Transition from Paper Records to Electronic Medical Records

机译:动态医疗中的药物过敏文献:从纸质病历到电子病历的唯一过渡期间量化的错误和错失机会的病例报告

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Adverse drug events can occur in the ambulatory clinical setting from errors in medication allergy documentation. This study was conducted to quantify errors in documentation that occur within both paper and electronic medical records (EMR).During a period of transition from paper to EMR, a cross-sectional chart review was conducted in one ambulatory clinic. All patients receiving care on study days were approached for participation. A medication allergy history was obtained from each participant and validated. This medication allergy history was then compared to the medication allergy documented in several areas within the medical records. Eighty-nine patients were recruited. The error rates for nursing notes, the physician dictation, paper, and electronic summary pages were 0%, 14.8%, 11.1% and 15.5%, respectively. Our findings indicate that errors in medication allergy documentation occur frequently and may be increased when summary information is used. Summarized information should not be used clinically prior to validation. Introduction Medical errors are a common source of morbidity and mortality in the modern health care setting. Understanding errors in documentation can lead to improvements in medication management and safer patient care. In particular, adverse drug events are a common clinical problem in both the inpatient and outpatient setting.1 Lesar et al 2 determined that prescription errors related to missed patient allergies were one of the most common reasons for medication-related errors. Additionally, Jones and Como determined that medication errors involving drug allergies were most commonly caused by a lack of awareness by the prescribing physician.3 Pau et al 4 also found that 20% of patients had inaccurate hospital admission histories with regard to medication allergies, while other studies have demonstrated that medication allergy documentation needs significant improvement.5 No study evaluating the accuracy of medication allergy documentation at multiple points in an outpatient encounter and medical record has been described to date. Understanding current practices in documentation could help improve accuracy in the medical record and ultimately patient care and safety. This study was designed to quantify errors in medication allergy documentation that occur across the medical record. The period of transition from paper to EMR records gives unique opportunity to study the accuracy of this information. Both paper records and an EMR were in use during this study. This study compares documentation of allergy history in an outpatient paper record to documentation in a comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR). In addition, this study was designed to document missed opportunities to update the summary records or problem lists in the paper record and the EMR. Methods Study Design and SettingA cross-sectional chart review was conducted in one family practice clinic, a part of the Scott and White Healthcare System. This clinic is also affiliated with the Central Texas Primary Care Research Network (CenTexNet), a primary care practiced-based research network (PBRN) headquartered in Temple, Texas. Scott & White Healthcare System is an integrated health care network consisting of two large referral hospitals, allied health services, home health care services, multiple specialty clinics and primary care clinics. It is the primary clinical teaching site for the Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine. At the time of the study, physicians and staff were transitioning from primary dependence on paper records to the exclusive use of an outpatient EMR. The EMR used in the system is available to all practicing physicians within both the inpatient and outpatient facilities within the system. Dictated hospital and outpatient records are stored and accessed via this EMR. Laboratory, radiology and nursing notes are also available in the EMR. In addition, many clinics have historically kept a paper record in
机译:由于药物过敏文档中的错误,在门诊临床环境中可能发生不良药物事件。这项研究旨在量化纸质和电子病历(EMR)中发生的文档错误。在从纸质过渡到EMR的一段时间内,在一家门诊诊所进行了横断面图审查。所有在研究日接受护理的患者均被纳入研究。从每个参与者获得药物过敏史并进行验证。然后将此药物过敏史与病历中多个区域记录的药物过敏进行比较。招募了89名患者。护理笔记,医师要求,论文和电子摘要页面的错误率分别为0%,14.8%,11.1%和15.5%。我们的发现表明,药物过敏文档中的错误经常发生,使用摘要信息时可能会增加。验证之前,不应在临床上使用汇总信息。简介医疗错误是现代医疗机构中发病和死亡的常见原因。了解文档中的错误可以改善药物管理和更安全的患者护理。尤其是,药物不良反应是住院和门诊患者的常见临床问题。1Lesar等[2]确定,与患者过敏症遗漏相关的处方错误是药物相关错误的最常见原因之一。此外,琼斯和科莫还确定,涉及药物过敏的药物错误最常见是由开药医生缺乏了解引起的。3Pau等[4]还发现,有20%的患者对药物过敏的住院史不准确,而其他研究表明,药物过敏文档需要显着改善。5迄今为止,还没有描述对门诊患者接触和医疗记录中多个点的药物过敏文档的准确性进行评估的研究。了解文档中的当前做法可能有助于提高病历的准确性,并最终提高患者的护理和安全性。本研究旨在量化整个医疗记录中发生的药物过敏文档中的错误。从纸质记录到EMR记录的过渡时期为研究此信息的准确性提供了独特的机会。这项研究中同时使用了纸质记录和EMR。这项研究将门诊纸质记录中过敏史的记录与综合电子病历(EMR)中的记录进行了比较。此外,本研究旨在记录错过的机会,以更新纸质记录和EMR中的摘要记录或问题列表。方法研究设计和设置横断面图审查是在Scott and White Healthcare System的一部分家庭诊所中进行的。该诊所还隶属于德克萨斯州中央初级保健研究网络(CenTexNet),后者是总部位于德克萨斯州坦普尔的基于初级保健实践的研究网络(PBRN)。 Scott&White Healthcare System是一个集成的医疗保健网络,由两家大型转诊医院,专职医疗服务,家庭医疗服务,多家专科诊所和初级保健诊所组成。它是德克萨斯州A&M健康科学中心医学院的主要临床教学站点。在研究时,医生和工作人员正在从对纸质记录的主要依赖转变为仅使用门诊EMR。系统中使用的EMR可供系统中住院和门诊设施内的所有执业医师使用。专用的医院和门诊记录通过此EMR进行存储和访问。 EMR还提供实验室,放射学和护理说明。此外,许多诊所历来都在

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号