首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. >Is the patient’s baseline inhaled steroid dose a factor for choosing the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy regimen?
【24h】

Is the patient’s baseline inhaled steroid dose a factor for choosing the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy regimen?

机译:患者的基线吸入类固醇剂量是选择布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗方案的因素吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Baseline inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose may be a factor for prescribers to consider when they select a budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy regimen for symptomatic asthmatics. Methods: A 6-month randomized study compared two maintenance doses of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5?μg, 1?×?2 and 2?×?2, plus as needed, in 8424 asthma patients with symptoms when treated with ICS?±?an inhaled long-acting β2-agonist (LABA). In the total study population, 1339 (17%) were high-dose ICS (HD) users (≥1600?μg/day budesonide). This HD stratum was compared with the rest of the study population, divided into low-dose (LD; 400?μg/day) and medium-dose strata (MD; 401–1599?μg/day) with regard to severe asthma exacerbations and mean changes in five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ5) scores from baseline. Results: In all three strata there were fewer exacerbations in the 2?×?2 treatment groups (yearly rates 0.268, 0.172 and 0.094) than in the 1?×?2 treatment groups (yearly rates 0.232, 0.138 and 0.764). In no stratum was the difference between the treatment groups statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in time to the first severe exacerbation between the treatments 2?×?2 and 1?×?2 in the HD group (hazard ratio 0.944, p?=?0.75). The adjusted mean changes in ACQ5 scores in the HD, MD and LD strata were ?0.89, ?0.61 and ?0.65, respectively, with 1?×?2 treatment and ?0.90, ?0.74 and ?0.76, respectively, with 2?×?2 treatment. In the MD and LD strata, the difference between doses was significant in favour of 2?×?2 (MD p p?=?0.004), but not in the HD stratum (p?=?0.870). No difference in serious adverse events was seen. Conclusion: Compared with the LD and MD strata, the HD stratum patients had more exacerbations and a shorter time to first exacerbation. However, there were no differences in response between the 1?×?2 and 2?×?2 groups in any of the strata. This indicates that patients using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy, irrespective of baseline ICS dose, can be switched to 1?×?2 with its lower steroid load. ACQ5 scores improved more in the HD stratum than in the MD and LD strata indicating, among other things, that HD patients were not overtreated at baseline. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT00463866
机译:目的:基线吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)剂量可能是开药者在选择有症状的哮喘患者使用布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗方案时应考虑的因素。方法:一项为期6个月的随机研究比较了8424例接受ICS?±治疗的哮喘患者的布地奈德/福莫特罗160 / 4.5?g,1?×?2和2?×?2的两种维持剂量,以及根据需要加用。吸入一种长效β 2 激动剂(LABA)。在全部研究人群中,有1339人(占17%)是大剂量ICS(HD)使用者(布地奈德≥1600?g /天)。将该HD阶层与其余研究人群进行比较,就严重哮喘加重和严重哮喘发作分为低剂量(LD;400μg/天)和中等剂量(MD;401-1599μg/天)。五项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ 5 )得分相对于基线的平均变化。结果:在所有三个阶层中,2××2治疗组(年率0.268、0.172和0.094)加重次数少于1××2 2治疗组(年率0.232、0.138和0.764)。各治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义。在HD组中,治疗2?×?2和1?×?2之间第一次严重加重的时间在统计学上没有显着差异(危险比0.944,p?=?0.75)。 HD,MD和LD阶层的ACQ 5 得分经校正后的平均变化分别为1××2处理和0.90、0.74和0.75,分别为0.89、0.61和0.65。分别用2?×?2处理0.76。在MD和LD层中,剂量之间的差异是显着的,有利于2××2(MD p p = 0.004),而在HD层则没有(p = 0.870)。严重不良事件无差异。结论:与LD和MD层相比,HD层患者病情加重且首次发作时间短。然而,在任何层中,1α×α2和2α×α2组之间的响应没有差异。这表明使用布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解疗法的患者,无论基线ICS剂量如何,都可将其类固醇负荷降低至1?×?2。 HD阶层的ACQ 5 评分比MD和LD阶层的改善更大,这表明HD病人在基线时并未得到过度治疗。 ClinicalTrials.gov注册:NCT00463866

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号