首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. >Impact of an antifungal stewardship intervention on optimization of candidemia management
【24h】

Impact of an antifungal stewardship intervention on optimization of candidemia management

机译:抗真菌管理干预对优化念珠菌血症管理的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Candidemia represents a leading cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have demonstrated that comprehensive care bundles improve candidemia management but are time-consuming. To determine the impact of a one-time targeted candidemia intervention on time to initiation of adequate therapy compared to standard of care. This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, quasi-experiment evaluated a targeted candidemia intervention involving a single phone call to the primary team providing recommendations for care. Daily follow-up was provided by the infectious diseases (ID) consult service. Two time periods were evaluated: pre-intervention (01 August 2012 to 31 July 2014) and post-intervention (01 October 2014 to 30 September 2016). The primary endpoint was time to adequate antifungal therapy (TTx) in the business hours (6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday) population (BHP). Secondary endpoints were TTx in the total population as well as infection-related length of stay (IF-LOS) and compliance with quality indicators (composite endpoint: ophthalmology (OPH) consult, repeat cultures, and ?14 days of adequate therapy). In all, 117 patients were included (pre-intervention = 50, post-intervention = 67, BHP = 51). TTx decreased from 2 h 57 m to 2 h 12 m (p = 0.094) in the BHP and 3 h 30 m to 2 h 9 m (p = 0.021) in the total population. There was no difference in IF-LOS (p = 0.797), compliance with quality indicators (p = 0.343), or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.761). Post-intervention, there were more ID and OPH consults (p 0.001). Our one-time candidemia intervention did not statistically decrease time to adequate therapy in the BHP, but did in the total population. No differences were found for other clinical outcomes, except increases in ID and OPH consults. Further studies are needed to examine whether a one-time intervention is non-inferior to a more comprehensive care bundle.
机译:念珠菌血症是与医疗保健相关的血液感染的主要原因,其发病率和死亡率均很高。先前的研究表明,综合护理捆绑可改善念珠菌血症的管理,但很耗时。为了确定一次针对性念珠菌血症干预对开始适当治疗的时间(与标准护理相比)的影响。这项经过机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的准实验评估了针对性的念珠菌病干预措施,该干预措施只需打给主要小组的一次电话,即可提供治疗建议。传染病(ID)咨询服务提供了每日随访。评估了两个时间段:干预前(2012年8月1日至2014年7月31日)和干预后(2014年10月1日至2016年9月30日)。主要终点是在工作时间(星期一至星期五,上午6点至下午6点)人口(BHP)中进行适当的抗真菌治疗(TTx)的时间。次要终点为总人口中的TTx以及与感染相关的住院时间(IF-LOS)和对质量指标的依从性(终点:眼科(OPH)咨询,重复培养和14天的适当治疗)。总共纳入了117例患者(干预前= 50,干预后= 67,BHP = 51)。必和必拓的TTx从2 h 57 m降至2 h 12 m(p = 0.094),总人口从3 h 30 m降至2 h 9 m(p = 0.021)。 IF-LOS(p = 0.797),对质量指标的依从性(p = 0.343)或院内死亡率(p = 0.761)没有差异。干预后,有更多的ID和OPH咨询(p <0.001)。我们的一次念珠菌血症干预并没有统计地减少必和必拓获得适当治疗的时间,但在总人群中确实如此。除ID和OPH咨询增加外,其他临床结局无差异。需要进行进一步的研究,以检查一次性干预是否不逊于更全面的护理组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号