...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >Comparison of the clinical features and outcomes of infective endocarditis between hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis patients
【24h】

Comparison of the clinical features and outcomes of infective endocarditis between hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis patients

机译:血液透析和非血液透析患者感染性心内膜炎的临床特征和结局比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are more susceptible to infective endocarditis (IE) due to the increased risk of bacterial invasion through intravascular access. However, it remains unclear whether the causative organisms and outcomes of IE in HD patients differ from those in non-HD patients. This study clarified the differences in clinical presentation and outcomes between HD and non-HD patients. At our hospital, we performed a retrospective study of 39 HD and 51 non-HD patients with echocardiography-confirmed IE between June 2000 and February 2007. No differences in sex, intravenous drug use, previous diagnosis of congestive heart failure, and previous valvular surgery were observed between these two groups. The number of patients with diabetic mellitus in these two groups was significantly different (28.2% HD vs 5.9% non-HD patients). The C-reactive protein levels in the two groups were not significantly different. By contrast, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly higher in the HD patients (HD vs non-HD: 87.2±33.32 vs 52.96±28.19). The incidence of IE involving the mitral valve (MV; 45.1%) or the aortic valve (AV; 43.1%) was similar among the non-HD patients, whereas a preference of IE involving the MV (79.5%) over the AV (15.4%) was noted among the HD patients. The HD patients had a significantly higher Staphylococcus aureus infection rate (HD: 46.2%; non-HD: 27.5%). The proportion of methicillin-resistant S . aureus (MRSA; 83.8%) infection accounting for S . aureus IE in the HD group was higher than that (28.6%) in the non-HD group. The in-hospital mortality rate did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, compared with non-HD patients, a propensity of IE involving the MV and a higher MRSA infection rate were observed in HD patients. The in-hospital mortality rate of echocardiography-confirmed IE did not differ between the two groups.
机译:血液透析(HD)患者由于通过血管内通路导致细菌入侵的风险增加,因此更容易感染传染性心内膜炎(IE)。然而,目前尚不清楚HD患者与非HD患者的IE致病菌和结局是否不同。这项研究阐明了HD和非HD患者在临床表现和预后方面的差异。在我们的医院中,我们对2000年6月至2007年2月之间经超声心动图确认的IE的39例HD和51例非HD患者进行了回顾性研究。性别,静脉内用药,先前诊断为充血性心力衰竭和先前进行瓣膜手术均无差异在两组之间观察到。两组的糖尿病患者人数显着不同(28.2%HD与5.9%非HD患者)。两组的C反应蛋白水平无明显差异。相比之下,HD患者的红细胞沉降率显着更高(HD vs非HD:87.2±33.32 vs 52.96±28.19)。在非HD患者中,涉及二尖瓣(MV; 45.1%)或主动脉瓣(AV; 43.1%)的IE的发生率相似,而相对于AV(15.4),涉及MV(79.5%)的IE优先在HD患者中注意到%)。 HD患者的金黄色葡萄球菌感染率明显更高(HD:46.2%;非HD:27.5%)。耐甲氧西林S的比例。金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA; 83.8%)感染占S。 HD组的金黄色葡萄球菌IE高于非HD组的28.6%。两组的院内死亡率无差异。总之,与非HD患者相比,HD患者中IE涉及MV的倾向和较高的MRSA感染率。两组之间超声心动图证实的IE的院内死亡率没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号