...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Global Health >Mass deworming to improve developmental health and wellbeing of children in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Mass deworming to improve developmental health and wellbeing of children in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:大规模驱虫以改善低收入和中等收入国家儿童的发育健康和福祉:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary BackgroundSoil-transmitted helminthiasis and schistosomiasis, considered among the neglected tropical diseases by WHO, affect more than a third of the world's population, with varying intensity of infection. We aimed to evaluate the effects of mass deworming for soil-transmitted helminths (with or without deworming for schistosomiasis or co-interventions) on growth, educational achievement, cognition, school attendance, quality of life, and adverse effects in children in endemic helminth areas.MethodsWe searched 11 databases up to Jan 14, 2016, websites and trial registers, contacted authors, and reviewed reference lists. We included studies published in any language of children aged 6 months to 16 years, with mass deworming for soil-transmitted helminths or schistosomiasis (alone or in combination with other interventions) for 4 months or longer, that reported the primary outcomes of interest. We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials, controlled before–after studies, interrupted time series, and quasi-experimental studies. We screened in duplicate, then extracted data and appraised risk of bias in duplicate with a pre-tested form. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis.FindingsWe included 52 studies of duration 5 years or less with 1?108?541 children, and four long-term studies 8–10 years after mass deworming programmes with more than 160?000 children. Overall risk of bias was moderate. Mass deworming for soil-transmitted helminths compared with controls led to little to no improvement in weight over a period of about 12 months (0·99 kg, 95% credible interval [CrI] ?0·09 to 0·28; moderate certainty evidence) or height (0·07 cm, 95% CrI ?0·10 to 0·24; moderate certainty evidence), little to no difference in proportion stunted (eight fewer per 1000 children, 95% CrI ?48 to 32; high certainty evidence), cognition measured by short-term attention (?0·23 points on a 100 point scale, 95% CI ?0·56 to 0·14; high certainty evidence), school attendance (1% higher, 95% CI ?1 to 3; high certainty evidence), or mortality (one fewer per 1000 children, 95% CI ?3 to 1; high certainty evidence). We found no data on quality of life and little evidence of adverse effects. Mass deworming for schistosomiasis might slightly increase weight (0·41 kg, 95% CrI ?0·20 to 0·91) and has little to no effect on height (low certainty evidence) and cognition (moderate certainty evidence). Our analyses do not suggest indirect benefits for untreated children from being exposed to treated children in the community. We are uncertain about effects on long-term economic productivity (hours worked), cognition, literacy, and school enrolment owing to very low certainty evidence. Results were consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses by age, worm prevalence, baseline nutritional status, infection status, impact on worms, infection intensity, types of worms (ascaris, hookworm, or trichuris), risk of bias, cluster versus individual trials, compliance, and attrition.InterpretationMass deworming for soil-transmitted helminths with or without deworming for schistosomiasis had little effect. For schistosomiasis, mass deworming might be effective for weight but is probably ineffective for height, cognition, and attendance. Future research should assess which subset of children do benefit from mass deworming, if any, using individual participant data meta-analysis.FundingCanadian Institutes of Health Research and WHO. prs.rt("abs_end"); Introduction WHO recommends mass deworming for soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis in endemic areas, combined with improved sanitation and health education to sustain the effects and reduce reinfection. 1 Mass deworming of children has been described as the most cost-effective strategy to improve educational attendance in endemic helminth countries. 2 Although deworming is inexpensive (US$0·50) per child, 3 the global cost of implementing the WHO recommendations for all children is estimated to be $276 million annually. 4
机译:发明背景世卫组织认为,土壤传播的蠕虫病和血吸虫病是被世界卫生组织忽略的热带病之一,其感染强度变化不一,影响了世界三分之一以上的人口。我们旨在评估大规模驱虫对土壤传播的蠕虫(有无驱虫对血吸虫病或共同干预的影响)对地方性蠕虫地区儿童生长,教育成就,认知,就学,生活质量以及不良影响的影响方法我们搜索了截至2016年1月14日的11个数据库,网站和试用注册簿,联系的作者并查看了参考文献清单。我们纳入了以任何语言对6个月至16岁的儿童进行的研究,其中有4个月或更长时间对通过土壤传播的蠕虫或血吸虫病(单独或与其他干预措施结合)进行了大规模驱虫研究,这些研究报告了主要的研究结果。我们纳入了随机和半随机试验,研究前后均进行了对照研究,中断了时间序列,并进行了准实验研究。我们一式两份地进行筛选,然后提取数据并用预先测试的形式评估一式两份的偏倚风险。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。发现我们纳入了52项持续时间为5年或更少的研究,涉及1?108?541名儿童,以及四项长期研究,这些研究是在大规模驱虫计划之后的8-10年进行的,研究对象为160,000名儿童。总体偏见风险中等。与对照组相比,对土壤传播的蠕虫进行大规模驱虫导致体重几乎没有改善或没有改善(0·99 kg,95%可信区间[CrI]?0·09至0·28;确定性中等) )或身高(0·07 cm,95%CrI?0·10至0·24;中度确定性证据),发育不良的比例几乎没有差异(每千名儿童少8个,95%CrI?48至32;高确定性证据),通过短期注意力测度的认知(100分制上的?0·23分,95%CI?0·56到0·14;高确定性证据),入学率(高1%,95%CI? 1到3;高确定性证据)或死亡率(每1000名儿童少一,95%CI?3:1;高确定性证据)。我们没有发现有关生活质量的数据,也没有发现不良影响的证据。对血吸虫病进行大规模驱虫可能会稍微增加体重(0·41 kg,95%CrI?0·20至0·91),并且对身高(低确定性证据)和认知(中度确定性证据)影响很小或没有影响。我们的分析并未表明未接触治疗的儿童因接触社区中的接受治疗的儿童而间接受益。由于确定性证据不足,我们不确定对长期经济生产率(工作时间),认知,识字率和入学率的影响。通过年龄,蠕虫患病率,基线营养状况,感染状况,对蠕虫的影响,感染强度,蠕虫类型(a虫,钩虫或,虫),偏倚风险,聚类与个体试验,依从性之间的敏感性和亚组分析,结果是一致的解释对于土壤传播的蠕虫,对或不对血吸虫病进行驱虫,对蠕虫的大量驱虫效果不佳。对于血吸虫病,大规模驱虫对减轻体重可能有效,但对身高,认知和出勤率可能无效。未来的研究应使用个体参与者数据荟萃分析来评估哪些儿童确实可以从大规模驱虫中受益(资助)。加拿大卫生研究所和世界卫生组织。 prs.rt(“ abs_end”);引言世卫组织建议对流行地区的土壤传播的蠕虫和血吸虫病进行大规模驱虫,并结合改善的卫生条件和健康教育以维持其效果并减少再感染。 1 儿童大规模驱虫被描述为提高地方性蠕虫国家教育出勤率的最经济有效的策略。 2 尽管每个儿童进行驱虫的费用不菲(0·50美元),但 3 每年为所有儿童实施WHO建议的全球成本估计为2.76亿美元。 4

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号