首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nutrition: Official Organ of the American Institute of Nutrition >The Household Food Insecurity Access Scale and an Index-Member Dietary Diversity Score Contribute Valid and Complementary Information on Household Food Insecurity in an Urban West-African Setting
【24h】

The Household Food Insecurity Access Scale and an Index-Member Dietary Diversity Score Contribute Valid and Complementary Information on Household Food Insecurity in an Urban West-African Setting

机译:家庭粮食无保障获取量表和成员膳食多样性指数为西非城市环境中的家庭粮食无保障提供了有效和补充的信息

获取原文
       

摘要

The number of urban poor is increasing quickly in West Africa, yet food security early warning systems still do not include urban areas. One reason is the lack of appropriate and internationally agreed-upon indicators to measure urban household food insecurity. Our objective was to assess the performance of the household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) and an index-member’s dietary diversity score (IDDS) to approximate the adequacy of urban households’ diets. A survey was performed on a random cluster sample of 1056 households in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Data on HFIAS and IDDS and 2 nonconsecutive household quantitative 24-h recalls were collected twice, in June-July and in November-December 2007. Diet adequacy was assessed through the household’s mean adequacy ratio (MAR) using energy and 11 micronutrients. Structural equation modeling was used to quantify the association of each candidate indicator with the MAR and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess their targeting performance in predicting low or high MAR. HFIAS was negatively associated with the MAR [path coefficient (P) = ?7.95 × 10?3 ± 1.45 × 10?3; P 0.001], whereas IDDS was positively associated with it (P = 5.19 × 10?2 ± 1.27 × 10?2; P 0.001). Areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.585 to 0.661 for HFIAS and from 0.536 to 0.629 for IDDS. In conclusion, HFIAS and IDDS performed well in approximating adequacy of urban households’ diets. They are informative indicators about urban food insecurity, promising for evaluation and monitoring but not for household targeting given their insufficient predictive power.
机译:西非的城市贫困人口正在迅速增加,但粮食安全预警系统仍不包括城市地区。原因之一是缺乏适当的和国际公认的指标来衡量城市家庭粮食不安全。我们的目标是评估家庭粮食无保障获取量表(HFIAS)的性能以及指数成员的饮食多样性评分(IDDS),以近似估算城市家庭饮食的充足性。对布基纳法索瓦加杜古的1056户家庭进行了随机抽样调查。在2007年6月至7月和11月至12月,两次收集了HFIAS和IDDS数据以及2次非连续的家庭24小时定量召回。通过使用能量和11种微量营养素的家庭平均充足率(MAR)评估了饮食的充足性。使用结构方程模型来量化每个候选指标与MAR的关联,并进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析以评估其在预测低或高MAR时的目标性能。 HFIAS与MAR负相关[路径系数(P)=?7.95×10?3±1.45×10?3; P <0.001],而IDDS与之呈正相关(P = 5.19×10?2±1.27×10?2; P <0.001)。对于HFIAS,ROC曲线下的区域范围为0.585至0.661,对于IDDS,其ROC曲线范围为0.536至0.629。总之,HFIAS和IDDS在估算城市家庭膳食充足性方面表现良好。它们是有关城市粮食不安全的信息性指标,有希望用于评估和监测,但鉴于其预测能力不足,因此不能用于以家庭为目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号