...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Performing Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Mitral Valve Operations Is Not Associated With Increased Operative Mortality
【24h】

Performing Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Mitral Valve Operations Is Not Associated With Increased Operative Mortality

机译:二尖瓣手术时进行三尖瓣瓣膜修复与手术死亡率增加无关

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The performance of concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVr) at the time of mitral valve repair or replacement (MVRR) has previously been associated with elevated short-term risk. Outcomes were assessed at incremental grades of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the contemporary risk of concomitant TVr.;Methods Between July 2011 and June 2014, 88,473 patients undergoing MVRR were examined using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Outcomes with or without TVr, after isolated MVRR (n?= 62,118) and MVRR with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG [n?= 26,355]), were independently analyzed at three levels of TR: none-mild, moderate, and severe. Risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality associated with the performance of concomitant TVr were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.;Results The TR was graded as none-mild in 74.3% of patients (65,769 of 88,473), moderate in 17.2% (15,222 of 88,473), and severe in 8.5% (7,482 of 88,473). The rate of?TVr by TR grade was 3.5% (2,308 of 65,769) for none-mild, 30.6% (4,661 of 15,222) for moderate, and 75.6% (5,654 of 7,482) for severe. Overall risk-adjusted occurrence of any morbidity associated with performance of TVr was increased in both groups (MVRR odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24 to 1.48; and MVRR plus CABG OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.49). However, at all grades of TR, TVr was not associated with increased risk-adjusted mortality (MVRR OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.17; and MVRR plus CABG OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.27).;Conclusions In contemporary patients, concomitant TVr is not associated with a risk-adjusted increase in mortality, regardless of TR severity. A more liberal approach to TVr at the time of MVRR may be justified when long-term benefits are thought to outweigh incremental short-term morbidity risk. Further investigation of longitudinal TVr outcomes is warranted.;;Dr Gammie discloses a financial relationship with Edwards Lifesciences.;Jump to SectionMaterial and MethodsPatient PopulationStudy DesignStatistical AnalysisResultsCommentStudy LimitationsConclusionReferences;Between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2014, 89,008 patients underwent MVRR operations with or without concomitant TVr, surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), closure of an atrial septal defect, or concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD). Patients from institutions outside of North America, those with missing age or sex data, patients with prior MitraClip procedures, or those undergoing any concomitant operations other than previously noted, were excluded. This resulted in a final study population of 88,473 patients.;The entire cohort was analyzed for baseline demographics and all STS comorbid risk variables. To mitigate the influence of concomitant CABG on the outcomes and endpoints of concomitant TVr, MVRR plus CABG patients were independently analyzed. Therefore, the final study population was categorized into those undergoing isolated MVRR (n?= 62,118), and those having MVRR plus CABG (n?= 26,355).;Separate risk-adjusted multivariable regression analyses were performed for MVRR and MVRR plus CABG populations for the endpoints of mortality and major morbidity. Mortality was defined as inhospital or 30-day operative mortality. Major morbidity was defined as the occurrence of any of the following: prolonged ventilation more than 24 hours, deep sternal wound infection, stroke, renal failure, or reoperation. Logistic regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics as established by existing STS cardiac surgery risk models [21, 22]. The covariates in the current model included preoperative atrial fibrillation, age, race, body surface area, congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, creatinine, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus plus control methods, number of diseased vessels, left main, ejection fraction, intraa
机译:背景技术二尖瓣修复或置换(MVRR)时伴发三尖瓣修复(TVr)的表现以前曾与短期风险升高相关。在三尖瓣关闭不全(TR)的递增级别上评估结局,以量化当代并发TVr的风险。方法:2011年7月至2014年6月,使用胸外科医师协会数据库检查了88,473例MVRR患者。在单独的MVRR(n = 62,118)和MVRR冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG [n = 26,355])之后,有无TVr的结果在TR的三个水平上独立分析:无轻度,中度和重度。使用多变量logistic回归评估与伴随TVr表现相关的风险调整后的发病率和死亡率。结果在74.3%的患者(88,473的65,769)中,TR的评分为轻度,中度为17.2%(88,473的15,222) ,严重程度为8.5%(88,473,共7,482)。非轻度TR等级的TVr率为3.5%(65,769的2,308),中度为30.6%(15,222的4661),重度为75.6%(7,482的5,654)。两组中与TVr表现相关的任何疾病的总风险调整后发生率均增加(MVRR比值比[OR] 1.36,95%置信区间[CI]:1.24至1.48;以及MVRR加CABG或1.33,95%CI: 1.19至1.49)。但是,在所有级别的TR中,TVr均与风险调整后的死亡率增加无关(MVRR或0.99,95%CI:0.84至1.17; MVRR加CABG或1.04,95%CI:0.85至1.27)。在当代患者中,无论TR的严重程度如何,伴随TVr的患者均未经过风险调整的死亡率增加。如果认为长期利益大于增加的短期发病风险,则在MVRR时采用更宽松的TVr方法可能是合理的。有必要对纵向TVr结局进行进一步研究。胸外科医生学会(STS)成人心脏外科手术数据库(ACSD)中是否伴有TVr,手术消融房颤(AF),关闭房间隔缺损或伴发冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)。排除了来自北美以外机构的患者,年龄或性别数据缺失的患者,先前进行过MitraClip手术的患者或进行了除上述说明以外的任何伴随手术的患者。最终的研究人群为88,473名患者。对整个队列进行了基线人口统计学分析和所有STS合并症风险变量。为了减轻并发CABG对并发TVr结局和终点的影响,对MVRR和CABG患者进行了独立分析。因此,最终的研究人群可分为接受独立MVRR的人群(n = 62,118)和具有MVRR加CABG的人群(n = 26,355)。对MVRR和MVRR加CABG人群分别进行了风险调整后的多元回归分析。用于死亡率和高发病率的终点。死亡率定义为住院或30天手术死亡率。主要发病率定义为以下任何一种情况:长时间通气超过24小时,深胸骨伤口感染,中风,肾衰竭或再次手术。通过现有STS心脏手术风险模型建立的针对基线特征的Logistic回归模型[21,22]。当前模型中的协变量包括术前心房颤动,年龄,种族,体表面积,充血性心力衰竭,慢性肺病,肌酐,心血管疾病,脑血管意外,糖尿病加控制方法,患病血管数,左主干,射血分数内

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号