...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by?Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Effects of?Cumulative Institutional Experience on Adequacy of Lymphadenectomy
【24h】

Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by?Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Effects of?Cumulative Institutional Experience on Adequacy of Lymphadenectomy

机译:电视胸腔镜手术对非小细胞肺癌的肺叶切除术:累积的机构经验对淋巴结清扫术充分性的影响

获取原文

摘要

Because video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomies are increasingly being performed by thoracic surgeons, the adequacy of lymph node clearance by VATS compared with thoracotomy has been questioned, raising the possibility that patients are being understaged. One factor that may be overlooked in published studies is the learning curve of the surgeons and surgical volume in the adoption of VATS lobectomy. This study examined the effect of cumulative institutional VATS lobectomy experience on the adequacy of lymphadenectomy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a prospective database to identify 500 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at our institution between 2002 and 2012. For comparative purposes, the cohort was divided into halves, with an early group (first 250 cases) vs a late group (next 250 cases). Clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed. A propensity-matching analysis controlling for age, gender, pathologic stage, and percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second was done to compare survival and adequacy of lymphadenectomy.ResultsPatients operated on in the late group were significantly older (72 vs 69 years, p?= 0.001) and had worse pulmonary functions (median forced expiratory volume in 1 second 83% vs 91%, p < 0.001; median diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, 76% vs 85%, p < 0.001). Clinical and pathologic tumor sizes were significantly larger in the late group compared with the early group, with a median of 2.0 vs 1.8 cm (p?= 0.002) for clinical T size and median of 2.1 vs 2.0 cm (p?= 0.003) for pathologic T size. Patients in the late group had significantly more advanced clinical and pathologic stage distribution. The total number of lymph nodes and the number of nodal stations removed were significantly greater in the late group (p?= 0.012) than in the early group (p < 0.001), and same results were obtained after propensity matching. No difference was seen in disease-free survival between the propensity-matched early vs late groups at 3 years (82% vs 85%, p?= 0.187).ConclusionsFor patients with NSCLC resected by VATS lobectomy, cumulative institutional experience significantly and positively affects the adequacy of lymphadenectomy. This may be related to the initial surgeon’s learning curve with VATS lobectomy. As the experience with VATS lobectomy becomes more mature, the procedure is increasingly being performed on older patients, often with more compromised pulmonary function and more advanced stage disease. Despite the expanded inclusion of older and sicker patients for VATS lobectomy, no compromise was seen in their disease-free survival.
机译:由于越来越多的胸外科医师正在进行电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺切除术,因此与开胸手术相比,VATS清除淋巴结的有效性受到质疑,这增加了患者被低估的可能性。在发表的研究中可能被忽略的因素之一是采用VATS肺叶切除术时外科医生的学习曲线和手术量。方法我们回顾性回顾了前瞻性数据库,以鉴定2002年至2012年间在我院接受连续500例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)手术的VATS肺叶切除术的患者。为了进行比较,将队列分为两半,早期组(前250例)对比晚期组(后250例)。临床和病理因素进行了分析。在1秒内进行年龄,性别,病理分期和强制呼气量百分比的倾向匹配分析,以比较淋巴结清扫术的存活率和充分性。结果晚期组接受手术的患者年龄较大(72岁vs 69岁,p ?= 0.001)并具有较差的肺功能(1秒钟中位呼气量中位数83%相对于91%,p <0.001;肺对一氧化碳的中位扩散能力,76%相对于85% ,p <0.001)。晚期组的临床和病理肿瘤大小明显大于早期组,临床T大小的中位数为2.0 vs 1.8 cm(p?= 0.002),而临床T大小的中位数为2.1 vs 2.0 cm(p?0.003)。病理T大小。晚期组患者的临床和病理分期明显更高。晚期组的淋巴结总数和去除的淋巴结数量明显高于早期组(p <0.001),p = 0.012,倾向匹配后也得到了相同的结果。倾向匹配的早期组与晚期组在3年时的无病生存率无差异(82%,85%,85%,p?= 0.187)。结论对于VATS肺叶切除术切除的NSCLC患者,其累积的机构经验显着且积极地影响淋巴结清扫术的充分性。这可能与外科医生使用VATS肺叶切除术的学习曲线有关。随着VATS肺叶切除术的经验变得越来越成熟,越来越多的老年患者开始接受该手术,这些患者往往肺功能受损且病程更晚期。尽管越来越多的VATS肺叶切除术患者包括老年患者和病残患者,但他们的无病生存期并未受到影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号