首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Implementation of a Monitored Educational Curriculum and Impact on Pediatrics Resident In-Training Examination Scores
【24h】

Implementation of a Monitored Educational Curriculum and Impact on Pediatrics Resident In-Training Examination Scores

机译:监控教育课程的实施及其对儿科住院医师入学考试成绩的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Setting and Problem Due to changes in duty hour restrictions implemented in 2011, the number of formal didactic sessions for pediatrics residents at the University of Maryland Children's Hospital was reduced by half. The potential negative impact on resident education resulting from restricted duty hours has been a frequent topic in the graduate medical education literature. This was echoed by our residency leadership who were concerned that the decrease in didactic time would adversely affect resident education, resulting in a decrease in the board pass rate and in preparedness for independent practice.;Intervention To offset the potential negative impact of decreased didactic time, we implemented a monitored educational curriculum, partially modeled after the continuing medical education requirements of state licensing boards. Our objective was to determine the effect of this intervention on resident learning as measured by the change in residents' pediatric in-training examination (ITE) scores over time. The ITE scores were chosen due to their strong association with scores on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) certifying examination. We created a central online repository for all required learning materials, selected by consensus by the pediatric education leadership, using the Blackboard Learn online coursework management system. Residents are required to complete a prespecified number of learning activities in 2 categories: (1) Category-A activities are required of all residents, and include PREP questions, the Yale Primary Care Pediatrics Curriculum, and monthly Pediatrics in Review (PIR) articles; and (2) Category-B activities are individualized and chosen based on residents' interests. They include attendance at daily conferences and a variety of other learning activities. Residents' achievement of required points is monitored by the chief residents through Pedialink for PREP questions and Blackboard Grade Center for most other activities. E-mail confirmations of educational activities not on Blackboard are also accepted for points. Points are recorded on a spreadsheet that is publically shared with the residents on a monthly basis. We implemented this innovation in the 2011–2012 academic year, assessed the impact on ITE scores (for graduating classes of 2011–2015), and collected resident feedback. The data were analyzed with standard t tests to compare the mean increases in ITE scores by postgraduate year (PGY) level between residents who trained prior to the curriculum (control group) and after its implementation (intervention group).;Outcomes to Date Outcomes were measured for 2 resident levels, PGY-1 to PGY-2 and PGY-1 to PGY-3. The PGY-1 to PGY-2 control group had 33 residents, with 27 in the intervention group. The mean difference in ITE scores from PGY-1 to PGY-2 in the intervention group was greater than the control group (150.7?points versus 96.7?points, respectively, P ?=? .04; FIGURE). The PGY-1 to PGY-3 control group had 19 residents, with 13 in the intervention group. The mean difference in ITE scores from PGY-1 to PGY-3 in the intervention group was not statistically different than the control group (209.2?points versus 147.4?points, respectively, P ?=? .06). The 2012 survey demonstrated improvement in completion of monthly educational activities (PIR articles 3.0 ± 1 versus 1.7 ± 1.4, P < .001; PREP questions 16.0 ± 5.3 versus 11.3 ± 7.6, P < .001; Category-B points 5.5 ± 3.9 versus 3.5 ± 3.9, P ?=? .02), with positive feedback. View larger version (34K) FIGUREEffect of Curriculum Implementation on Change in ITE Scores of Pediatrics Residents Abbreviation: ITE, in-training examination.;Conclusions Our monitored curriculum can be adopted or easily adapted by pediatrics residency programs across the country, and a similar set of educational requirements could be created for nonpediatrics programs, potentially improving readiness for practice and board pass rates among residents nationally.
机译:设置和问题由于2011年实施了工作时间限制的变更,马里兰大学儿童医院的儿科住院医师正式的教学课程减少了一半。限制的工作时间对居民教育的潜在负面影响一直是研究生医学教育文献中的常见话题。我们的居民领导层对此表示赞同,他们担心减少教学时间会对居民的教育产生不利影响,从而导致董事会通过率的下降以及对独立执业的准备减少。干预措施以抵消减少教学时间的潜在负面影响,我们实施了受监控的教育课程,部分以国家许可委员会的持续医学教育要求为蓝本。我们的目标是确定这种干预对居民学习的影响,方法是根据居民儿科训练中考试(ITE)分数随时间的变化来衡量。选择ITE分数是因为它们与美国儿科委员会(ABP)认证考试中的分数密切相关。我们使用Blackboard Learn在线课程管理系统,为所有必需的学习材料创建了一个中央在线存储库,这些信息是由儿科教育领导者一致选择的。要求居民完成两类预定数量的学习活动:(1)所有居民都必须进行A类活动,其中包括PREP问题,耶鲁初级保健儿科课程和每月儿科回顾(PIR)文章; (2)B类活动是根据居民的兴趣进行个性化选择的。其中包括参加日常会议和各种其他学习活动。主要居民通过Pedialink监控居民是否达到要求的分数以准备PREP问题,并通过Blackboard Grade Center进行大多数其他活动。还可以使用电子邮件确认不在Blackboard上的教育活动。点数记录在电子表格中,每月与居民公开共享。我们在2011–2012学年实施了这项创新,评估了对ITE分数的影响(针对2011–2015即将毕业的班级),并收集了居民反馈。使用标准t检验对数据进行了分析,以比较在课程开始之前(对照组)和课程实施之后(干预组)接受培训的居民之间按研究生年份(PGY)水平计算的ITE分数平均增长情况。针对PGY-1至PGY-2和PGY-1至PGY-3 2个居民级别进行了测量。 PGY-1至PGY-2对照组有33位居民,其中干预组有27位。干预组从PGY-1到PGY-2的ITE得分的平均差异大于对照组(分别为150.7分和96.7分,P = 0.44;图)。 PGY-1至PGY-3对照组有19位居民,其中干预组有13位。干预组从PGY-1到PGY-3的ITE评分的平均差异与对照组无统计学差异(分别为209.2点和147.4点,P == .06)。 2012年的调查表明,每月教育活动的完成情况有所改善(PIR文章3.0±1对1.7±1.4,P <.001; PREP问题16.0±5.3对11.3±7.6,P <.001; B类要点5.5±3.9对3.5±3.9,P?=?.02),具有正反馈。查看大图(34K)图课程实施对儿科住院医师ITE分数变化的影响缩写:ITE,培训中考试。可以为非儿科计划制定一定的教育要求,从而有可能改善全国居民的实践准备和董事会通过率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号