首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Variations in Team-Based Learning Methodology Call for Active Scholarship in Support of a Gold Standard
【24h】

Variations in Team-Based Learning Methodology Call for Active Scholarship in Support of a Gold Standard

机译:基于团队的学习方法的变化要求积极的奖学金来支持金本位制

获取原文
           

摘要

Riddell et al~(~(1)) provided an excellent of the benefits and barriers to team-based learning (TBL) in graduate medical education, as discussed in the JGME Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM) blog. While principles of TBL are well described, variations in implementation may have an impact on outcomes and successful replication in other programs. As mentioned in their article, many faculty have manipulated the TBL model to better suit the needs of their programs.~(~(1))At our institution, we also adapted the classic TBL framework to our needs. We are a large multisite, university-based internal medicine program that follows an 8+2 block schedule. We integrated TBL successfully in our academic half day within a longitudinal curriculum in ambulatory internal medicine. In a survey given 1 year after implementation, most residents acknowledged improved attention in the classroom (92%, 61 of 66); enhanced participation in didactics (89%, 58 of 65); and agreement that TBL is as good as or more effective than a traditional lecture (80%, 51 of 64). A total of 66 out of 91 residents completed the survey, and some did not answer all questions.
机译:如JGME急诊医学学术生活(ALiEM)博客中所述,Riddell等人(〜(1))为研究生医学教育中基于团队学习(TBL)的好处和障碍提供了极好的方法。尽管对TBL的原理进行了很好的描述,但实现方式的变化可能会对结果和其他程序中的成功复制产生影响。正如他们在文章中提到的,许多教师已经操纵TBL模型以更好地满足其程序的需求。〜(〜(1))在我们的机构中​​,我们还根据需要调整了经典的TBL框架。我们是一个大型的多站点,基于大学的内科医学计划,遵循8 + 2的时间表。我们将TBL成功地整合到我们的学术半天之内的动态内科纵向课程中。在实施1年后进行的一项调查中,大多数居民承认教室中的注意力得到了改善(66%的61中的92%)。加强对教学的参与(89%,65中的58);并同意TBL的表现优于或优于传统讲座(80%,64中的51)。在91位居民中,共有66位完成了调查,其中一些人未回答所有问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号