首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Remediation Methods for Milestones Related to Interpersonal and Communication Skills and Professionalism
【24h】

Remediation Methods for Milestones Related to Interpersonal and Communication Skills and Professionalism

机译:与人际交往技巧和职业素养相关的里程碑的补救方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains vignettes in emergency medicine, family medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry, as well as remediation approaches by proficiency level for Emergency Medicine Interpersonal and Communication Skills and Professionalism Milestones.;The Problem Despite the importance of professionalism and ICS to the training of future physicians, residency programs often struggle with educating residents in these areas, as well as providing effective remediation for those who fail to meet expectations.5–7 In a survey, pediatrics program directors reported that residents terminated after failed remediation were significantly more likely to have deficiencies in ICS and professionalism,8 while neurology program directors noted that the most prevalent issue for “problem neurology residents” was professionalism, as demonstrated by inappropriate interactions with colleagues and staff.9 Among program directors in emergency medicine, 80% noted that deficiencies in professionalism were harder to remediate than deficiencies in other core competencies.10 Clinical skills examination scores for Canadian medical students showed a predictive relationship between students who scored poorly on communication and future complaints in their medical practice, with students in the bottom quartile accounting for a significantly higher percentage of patient complaints.11 Program directors face multiple challenges in striving to effect successful remediation of residents failing to meet milestone achievements.12 While some specialties (such as emergency medicine, radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology)1,3 list suggested assessment methods for the competencies, many provide no guidance to program directors with regard to how to assess trainees in their progression on milestone achievements, and there are few specific recommendations for remediation when residents fail to meet expectations. While the Milestone Project provides programs with concrete achievements that residents must meet for each core competency and may aid programs in identifying residents who are not meeting expectations,1–4,27–29 the transition from identification to remediation requires knowledge of available resources and expertise in remediation and evaluating outcomes of remediation.30–34;A Remediation Task Force Was Born A remediation task force was developed for the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD-EM) and was charged with developing activities and tools to assist programs with remediation of residents regarding each proficiency level specific to each subcompetency. Our group focused on professionalism and ICS; each member completed an independent literature review regarding methods to remediate professionalism and ICS, and collated relevant literature from all medical specialties. Participants suggested specific methods to address remediation based on (1) a literature review, and (2) previous experience with remediation in professionalism and ICS. When approaching proficiency levels within professionalism and ICS, the group agreed to focus the assessment on levels 1 through 4, as level 5 represented aspirational achievements that may not be achieved during training, and thus did not require remediation. Consensus was obtained on specific methods to address substandard performance for proficiency levels 1 through 4 in each of the emergency medicine subcompetencies (references were used where available and are provided as online supplemental material).;Core Programs' Common Themes Identified for ICS and Professionalism As the task force work was completed, it became clear that our approach could be easily translated across graduate medical education programs. We then reviewed the subcompetencies for professionalism and ICS for the specialties of anesthesiology, diagnostic radiology, emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, pathology, pediatrics, psychiatry, obstetrics and gynecology, oph
机译:编者注:本文的在线版本包含急诊医学,家庭医学,妇产科和精神病学方面的小插曲,以及按熟练水平进行的急诊医学人际和沟通技巧和专业里程碑的补救方法。从专业性和ICS到未来医生的培训,居留计划通常难以在这些地区为居民提供教育,并为未能达到期望的人们提供有效的补救措施。5-7在一项调查中,儿科计划主管报告说居民被终止修复失败后,ICS和专业精神方面的缺陷更有可能出现[8],而神经病学项目主管指出,“问题神经病学居民”最普遍的问题是专业精神,与同事和员工的不适当互动就证明了这一点。9急救药,80%注意d)专业精神上的缺陷比其他核心能力上的缺陷更难补救。10加拿大医学生的临床技能考试成绩显示出在沟通方面得分较差的学生和他们在医学实践中未来的抱怨方面,与处于最后四分位数的学生之间存在预测关系占患者投诉的百分比显着增加。11计划主任在努力实现未能取得里程碑式成就的居民的成功补救方面面临多重挑战。12而某些专业(例如急诊医学,放射学,病理学和眼科)1,3列出了针对能力的建议评估方法,许多方法都没有向计划主管提供有关如何评估受训者在里程碑成就方面进展的指导,并且当居民未能达到期望时,几乎没有针对补救的具体建议。虽然“里程碑项目”为计划提供了居民必须实现的每项核心能力的具体成就,并且可以帮助计划确定不符合期望的居民,[1,4,27-29]从鉴定到补救的过渡需要对可用资源和专业知识的了解30-34;成立了补救工作组为应急医学住院医师理事会(CORD-EM)成立了一个补救工作组,负责制定活动和工具,以协助开展相关工作。针对每个子能力的每个熟练水平对居民进行的补救。我们的小组专注于专业精神和ICS;每位成员完成了有关补救专业和ICS方法的独立文献综述,并整理了所有医学专业的相关文献。参与者根据(1)文献综述和(2)以前在专业精神和ICS方面的补救经验,提出了解决补救的具体方法。在达到专业水平和ICS的熟练水平时,该小组同意将评估重点放在1到4级,因为5级代表了在培训期间可能无法实现的理想成就,因此不需要进行补救。就解决每种急诊医学子能力中1级至4级水平不合格表现的特定方法达成了共识(在可用的地方使用了参考文献,并作为在线补充材料提供);确定了ICS和专业精神的核心计划共同主题专案小组的工作已经完成,很明显,我们的方法可以很容易地转化为研究生医学教育计划。然后,我们回顾了麻醉学,诊断放射学,急诊医学,家庭医学,内科,病理学,儿科,精神病学,妇产科,oph等专业的专业和ICS子职能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号