...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of headache and pain >The Global Burden of Disease survey 2010, Lifting The Burden and thinking outside-the-box on headache disorders
【24h】

The Global Burden of Disease survey 2010, Lifting The Burden and thinking outside-the-box on headache disorders

机译:《 2010年全球疾病负担调查》,“减轻负担”和关于头痛疾病的开箱即用思维

获取原文

摘要

The perception of a disease in the collective imaginations of people affected by it, of the general public, of health-care providers and of health policy-makers depends, undoubtedly, on a multiplicity of diverse factors: its effects on mortality, its consequences in terms of ill health and disability, its economic impact, its implications for health services and health-resource consumption, the availability of treatments, the potential for the development of new pharmacological agents and interest aroused by the media. Chronic diseases also raise the question of patients鈥?reduced productive capacity over a long period 鈥?perhaps a life-time. Furthermore, it is evident that, in the face of concrete reductions in economic global resources, public health care must confront increasing demands. Increased expenditure on health cannot necessarily be expected; neither may it always lead to the anticipated or desired outcomes. In the past decade, headache has acquired a social dimension never previously recognized. It has always been part of people鈥檚 daily lives, as a very prevalent symptom of a multitude of disorders (but only a few of public-health importance), but scarcely has it appeared of pressing importance or deserving of high priority. Therefore, if it has received attention at all, this has been scant and grudging. All this may have changed, through the years, for a series of reasons: a better knowledge has been gained of the mechanisms of headache, and has been followed by the invention, development and marketing of specific drugs at least for migraine; there are better academic initiatives to educate in the field; but, most of all, there is now a large, and growing, body of work to attest the societal impact of headache disorders, their epidemiology, their cost and the humanitarian necessity (and economic wisdom) of creating and supporting structured health care dedicated to their mitigation [1鈥?span class="CitationRef">7]. We see increasing requests for medical education in the field of headache [8]. Yet it cannot be said that other research in this field is going through a period of innovation: with a dearth of new ideas and decreasing resources, few large research groups and fewer pharmaceutical companies see headache as a fertile area for their endeavours. The recent publication of the Global Burden of Disease survey 2010 (GBD 2010) [9] overturns all the prejudices, by demonstrating, with great clarity for those willing to see, where headache stands among the many causes of disability worldwide. Tension-type headache and migraine are the second and third most prevalent disorders in the world (after dental caries); migraine is the seventh highest cause of disability in the world. Is the world willing to see? Will it now take steps to remedy the past neglect of headache disorders and the inadequacies of its responses to them [7]? GBD 2010 is proof that it must. We have the basis on which to start again, to rethink the approach to headache as a major factor in public ill-health, with huge implications for health care and great impact on the global economy [10]. Health policy is focusing more and more on chronic non-communicable diseases. This evidence of the high place among these of headache disorders must stimulate a new renaissance in academic clinical research and call for new approaches for industrial strategies, moving their interests from serendipity to true, planned innovation. Lifting The Burden, through its unprecedented ten years of action, has traced a new way, working side by side with supranational organizations, with prestigious international academies, with Patients鈥?Associations and with many, many individuals. This long path has spread new ideas, created new structures from previously separated components, consolidated the actions 鈥?transforming them into synergies 鈥?of different partners with the same purpose: the control of headache disorders. It is time to thank the partners in this network, this projec
机译:在受疾病影响的人们,公众,卫生保健提供者和卫生政策制定者的集体想象中,对疾病的认识无疑取决于多种因素:其对死亡率的影响,其后果疾病和残障,经济影响,对卫生服务和健康资源消耗的影响,治疗的可获得性,开发新药理剂的潜力以及媒体引起的关注。慢性疾病还提出了一个问题,即患者长期可能会降低生产能力。此外,显然,面对全球经济资源的具体减少,公共卫生保健必须面对日益增长的需求。卫生支出不一定会增加;两者都不能总是导致预期或期望的结果。在过去的十年中,头痛已经获得了前所未有的社会影响。它一直是人们日常生活的一部分,是许多疾病的非常普遍的症状(但对公共卫生的重要性只有少数),但似乎并没有紧迫的重要性或应被高度重视。因此,如果它引起了所有人的注意,那就很少了。多年来,所有这一切可能由于一系列原因而发生了变化:人们对头痛的机理有了更深入的了解,并且紧随其后是发明,开发和销售至少用于偏头痛的特定药物;在该领域有更好的学术计划可供教育;但是,最重要的是,现在有大量且不断增长的工作量来证明头痛病的社会影响,其流行病学,其成本以及建立和支持致力于以下方面的结构性医疗保健的人道主义必要性(以及经济智慧):他们的缓解措施[1'?span class =“ CitationRef”> 7]。我们看到头痛领域对医学教育的需求不断增加[8]。但是,不能说该领域的其他研究正在经历一个创新时期:由于缺乏新的想法和资源的减少,很少有大型研究小组和制药公司将头痛视为他们努力的沃土。最近发布的《 2010年全球疾病负担调查》(GBD 2010)[9]颠覆了所有偏见,向那些愿意看到的人清楚地表明,头痛是世界范围内造成残疾的众多原因之一。紧张型头痛和偏头痛是世界上第二大和第三大最常见的疾病(仅次于龋齿);偏头痛是世界上第七大致残原因。世界愿意看到吗?现在是否会采取措施纠正过去对头痛疾病的忽视以及对这些疾病的反应不足[7]? GBD 2010证明了它必须做到。我们有重新开始的基础,重新考虑将头痛作为公共疾病的主要因素的方法,这对医疗保健具有巨大的影响,对全球经济也有很大的影响[10]。卫生政策越来越关注慢性非传染性疾病。这些头痛疾病中地位很高的证据必须激发学术临床研究的新复兴,并呼吁采用新的产业战略方法,将他们的兴趣从偶然性转向真正的计划创新。解除负担,通过其前所未有的十年行动,已经找到了一种新方法,可以与超国家组织,著名国际学院,患者协会以及许多很多个人并肩合作。这条漫长的道路传播了新的想法,从先前分离的组件中创建了新的结构,并以相同的目的巩固了不同伙伴的“转化为协同作用”的行为:控制头痛。现在该感谢这个网络中的合作伙伴,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号