首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Pathology >Book Review: Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease
【24h】

Book Review: Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease

机译:书评:与外国DNA的微竞争与慢性病的起源

获取原文
       

摘要

This is a difficult book. But it is also a fascinating work. The hypothesis of the book is a simple one, one that is expressed in the title: microcompetition with foreign DNA (a virus) leads to chronic diseases. To take an example from the chapter on atherosclerosis, microcompetition between a virus (in this case cytomegalovirus) and a transcription factor GABP leads to decreased binding of the latter to a DNA sequence, which in turn increases the degree of plaque formation. This is achieved through a series of steps that take effort to absorb. This is what makes the book difficult. The author painstakingly makes his case by setting up the building blocks for his argument. He does so by marshalling an impressive list of references that prove his point. He then takes those points a step further by funneling them into his hypothesis. This is done with the help of flow diagrams and mathematics—this too could make the job of reading this book difficult for some. I cannot claim that I understood every sentence in this book, but that, with the employment of more than the usual number of neurons (too many at times), I was able to comprehend many of the author's points. That this book is hard to read is definitely a criticism. But one thing is for certain that this book does not deserve to be left unread because it is difficult. Instead, this is work that demands a fair reading, or multiple fair readings, and beyond that, it needs to be evaluated, and ‘answered,’ as I explain below.
机译:这是一本很难的书。但这也是一件引人入胜的工作。这本书的假设很简单,即以标题表达的一种假设:与外来DNA(病毒)的微竞争会导致慢性疾病。以关于动脉粥样硬化的章节为例,病毒(在这种情况下为巨细胞病毒)与转录因子GABP之间的微竞争导致后者与DNA序列的结合减少,进而增加了噬菌斑形成的程度。这是通过努力吸收的一系列步骤来实现的。这就是使这本书很难的原因。作者通过为自己的论证建立基础来辛苦地陈述自己的观点。他这样做是通过整理一份令人印象深刻的参考文献列表来证明他的观点。然后,他通过将这些要点整合到他的假设中来进一步提高这些要点。这是借助流程图和数学方法完成的,这也可能使某些人难以阅读本书。我不能断言我能理解本书中的每个句子,但是,由于雇用了比平时更多的神经元(有时太多),我才能够理解作者的许多观点。很难读这本书绝对是一种批评。但是可以肯定的是,这本书不值得一读,因为它很困难。相反,这是一项需要公平阅读或多项公平阅读的工作,除此之外,还需要对其进行评估和“回答”,如下所述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号