首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Influences on the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between general practices: practice, patient or socioeconomic factors?
【24h】

Influences on the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between general practices: practice, patient or socioeconomic factors?

机译:一般实践之间对2型糖尿病患病率变化的影响:实践,患者或社会经济因素?

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is known to vary between countries, districts and general practices. The influence of early detection and screening on the variation of prevalence between general practices has not previously been investigated. AIM: To test the hypothesis that the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is associated with awareness of and screening for diabetes within general practices and to explore other factors that may explain the variation in prevalence between practices. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study of general practices. SETTING: Forty-two general practices in Newcastle and North Tyneside; 20% random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1056). METHOD: Factors thought to be associated with the variation of type 2 diabetes prevalence were collected from general practices through practice managers, medical records, and patient questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to quantify the association, and variables significant at the 5% level were entered into a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: There was a wide inter-practice variation in age/sex standardised type 2 diabetes prevalence (range = 0.69% to 2.73%; P < 0.001). There was no significant association between the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and the proportion of patients detected outside primary care or the proportion of patients detected through screening, accounting for only 2% and 3% of the variation in type 2 prevalence between practices, respectively. The mean Townsend deprivation score accounted for 42% of the variation in type 2 diabetes prevalence between practices, with more deprived practices having a higher prevalence. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that socieconomic deprivation, rather than detection through screening or awareness of diabetes, accounts for much of the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between practices.
机译:背景:2型糖尿病的患病率因国家,地区和一般实践而异。先前尚未研究过早期检测和筛查对一般实践之间患病率变化的影响。目的:检验2型糖尿病患病率与一般实践中对糖尿病的认识和筛查有关的假设,并探讨其他因素可以解释实践之间患病率的差异。研究设计:一般实践的横断面研究。地点:纽卡斯尔和北泰恩赛德地区的42个常规做法; 2%糖尿病患者的20%随机样本(n = 1056)。方法:通过实践管理者,病历和患者问卷调查从一般实践中收集被认为与2型糖尿病患病率变化有关的因素。皮尔逊相关系数用于量化关联,并将5%水平的显着变量输入多元线性回归模型。结果:年龄/性别标准化的2型糖尿病患病率在实践中存在很大差异(范围= 0.69%至2.73%; P <0.001)。 2型糖尿病的患病率与在初级保健以外发现的患者比例或通过筛查发现的患者比例之间没有显着关联,分别仅占实践之间2型糖尿病患病率变化的2%和3%。平均Townsend剥夺得分占实践之间2型糖尿病患病率变化的42%,而更多的剥夺实践患病率更高。结论:这项研究表明社会经济剥夺,而不是通过对糖尿病的筛查或认识来检测,是造成实践之间2型糖尿病患病率差异很大的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号