【24h】

Measuring success in asthma care: a repeat audit.

机译:评估哮喘护理成功与否:重复审核。

获取原文
           

摘要

An asthma audit was first performed in 1984 in a two-doctor semi-rural training practice in Shroshire with 4400 patients. This paper reports on a repeat of the audit in 1987 in the same practice, following a programme of minimal intervention. Interviews were conducted with 192 asthmatics, 96% of those known to the practice on a manual register. Between the 1984 and 1987 audits there was a significant increase in ownership of peak flow meters and their use for monitoring progress and an improvement in inhaler technique. There was a general improvement in patients' knowledge about asthma. Inadequate control was shown in 22% of the sample in 1987, but half of these patients were known to be non-compliant. There were significant improvements in scores for asthma disability in night-time symptoms in children (P less than 0.05) and in daytime symptoms in adults (P less than 0.001) between 1984 and 1987. It is concluded that improved levels of asthma care have been achieved in a small practice using checklists, booklets and repeated audit, but without structured follow up or an asthma clinic.
机译:哮喘审核于1984年在Shroshire进行,当时只有两位医生进行的半医生半乡村训练实践,共收治4400例患者。本文报告了按照最低限度干预计划进行的1987年相同实践的重复审计。采访了192名哮喘病患者,其中有96%的人是手工注册的。在1984年至1987年的审核之间,峰值流量计的拥有量及其用于监控进度的吸入器的使用显着增加,并且吸入器技术得到了改善。患者对哮喘的了解普遍得到改善。 1987年,有22%的样本显示控制不力,但已知其中有一半患者不依从。在1984年至1987年之间,儿童夜间症状(P小于0.05)和成人白天症状(P小于0.001)的哮喘残障评分得到了显着改善。结论是,改善了哮喘护理水平通过使用清单,小册子和反复审核的小型实践获得的结果,但没有进行结构化的随访或哮喘诊所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号