【24h】

Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners.

机译:心思病患者:对他们的全科医生的研究。

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND. A number of attempts have been made to investigate the heartsink, difficult, dysphoric or problem patient. Most studies have emphasized the role which the patient plays in evoking despair, anger and frustration in the doctor. However, one doctor's list of difficult patients may not necessarily be the same as another's. AIM. A study was undertaken to determine if the individual characteristics of general practitioners are associated with the number of heartsink patients they report on their patient lists. METHOD. Sixty out of 137 urban general practitioners drawn at random from the Sheffield Family Health Services Authority list were surveyed by structured interview and questionnaires in 1990. Outcome measures were interview data and scores on the 12-item general health questionnaire, Warr-Cook-Wall job satisfaction scale and the Bortner personality profile measure. RESULTS. Sixty per cent of the variance in the number of heartsink patients that general practitioners reported on their lists could be accounted for by the following four explanatory variables: greater perceived workload; lower job satisfaction; lack of training in counselling and/or communication skills; and lack of appropriate postgraduate qualifications. No other variables considered could account for the variance in the number of heartsink patients reported by general practitioners. CONCLUSION. The individual characteristics of doctors are associated with the number of heartsink patients reported by general practitioners. To reduce the number of such patients experienced, it may be necessary for general practitioners to reduce their workload and increase their job satisfaction and their level of relevant postgraduate training.
机译:背景。已经进行了许多尝试来调查心痛,困难,烦躁不安或有问题的患者。大多数研究都强调了患者在引起医生的绝望,愤怒和沮丧中所起的作用。但是,一位医生的困难患者名单可能不一定与另一位医生的名单相同。目标。进行了一项研究,以确定全科医生的个人特征是否与他们在患者名单上报告的令人心烦的患者数量有关。方法。在1990年从谢菲尔德家庭健康服务管理局的清单中随机抽取的137名城市全科医生中,有60名接受了结构化访谈和问卷调查。结果指标是访谈数据和12项普通卫生问卷中的得分,Warr-Cook-Wall工作满意度量表和Bortner人格特征量度。结果。全科医生在其清单上报告的心痛患者人数差异的60%可以由以下四个解释变量解释:较低的工作满意度;缺乏咨询和/或沟通技巧的培训;并且缺乏适当的研究生资格。没有其他考虑的变量可以解释全科医师报告的心痛患者人数的差异。结论。医生的个人特征与全科医生报告的心痛患者数量有关。为了减少此类患者的数量,全科医生可能有必要减少他们的工作量,提高他们的工作满意度和相关的研究生培训水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号