首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Prioritising patients on surgical waiting lists: a conjoint analysis study on the priority judgements of patients, surgeons, occupational physicians, and general practitioners.
【24h】

Prioritising patients on surgical waiting lists: a conjoint analysis study on the priority judgements of patients, surgeons, occupational physicians, and general practitioners.

机译:优先考虑患者在手术候诊名单上的情况:一项有关患者,外科医生,职业医生和全科医生的优先判断的联合分析研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The prioritisation of patients on waiting lists is ascribed high potential for diminishing the consequences of waiting times for elective surgery. However, consistent evidence is lacking about which factors determine patient priority and it is unclear whether different stakeholders have different opinions on this issue. This study, conducted in the Netherlands, investigates the judgements of patients, laypersons (i.e. patients on other waiting lists), and physicians on the priority of patients on waiting lists. Participants were former patients with varicose veins (N=82), inguinal hernia (N=86), and gallstones (N=89), 101 surgeons, 95 occupational physicians, and 65 general practitioners. Each participant judged the priority of paper vignettes of patients with varicose veins, inguinal hernia, and gallstones. The vignettes were designed according to conjoint analysis methodology and described the physical symptoms, the psychological distress, the social limitations, and impairments in work of patients. Multilevel regression analysis of the responses showed that all groups made significant distinctions in patient priority depending on the severity of each characteristic in the vignettes. The physical symptoms and impairments in work had on average the highest impact on priority, but the summed impact of non-physical factors exceeded that of the physical symptoms. The different groups of participants appraised only the importance of the physical symptoms differently, but opinions on priority varied widely within each group. Whereas the high level of agreement between the different groups would facilitate the acceptance and the implementation of explicit prioritisation of patients on the waiting list, the high inter-individual variation signifies that consensus criteria for prioritisation are needed to warrant equity and transparency in care provision.
机译:候诊名单上患者的优先排序被认为具有很大的潜力,可以减少择期手术等待时间的后果。但是,缺乏确定哪些因素决定患者优先级的一致证据,也不清楚不同的利益相关者是否对此问题有不同的看法。这项在荷兰进行的研究调查了患者,外行人员(即其他候补名单上的患者)和医生对候补名单上患者优先级的判断。参加者有静脉曲张(N = 82),腹股沟疝(N = 86)和胆结石(N = 89),101名外科医生,95名职业医师和65名全科医生。每个参与者都判断静脉曲张,腹股沟疝和胆结石患者的纸质晕影检查的优先级。根据联合分析方法设计了小插图,并描述了患者的身体症状,心理困扰,社会局限性和工作障碍。对反应的多级回归分析显示,所有组在患者优先级方面都有显着差异,具体取决于小插图中每个特征的严重性。平均而言,身体症状和工作障碍对优先级的影响最大,但是非身体因素的总和影响超过了身体症状。不同组的参与者仅以不同的方式评估了身体症状的重要性,但是在每个组中,关于优先级的观点差异很大。尽管不同群体之间的高度一致的协议将有助于在等待名单上接受和实施患者的明确优先次序,但个人之间的高度差异意味着需要优先次序达成共识的标准,以确保提供医疗服务的公平性和透明度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号