首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Problem-based learning: how do the outcomes compare with traditional teaching?
【24h】

Problem-based learning: how do the outcomes compare with traditional teaching?

机译:基于问题的学习:与传统教学相比,结果如何?

获取原文
           

摘要

Problem-based learning (PBL) was first introduced into the medical curriculum in the UK in 1995.1 With the support of the General Medical Council, who state that ‘modern educational theory and research must influence teaching and learning’,2 it has now been adopted in the majority of UK medical schools and is a core component of teaching in the four new English medical schools.3 It is thought that PBL will better equip doctors for lifelong learning, but is there a good evidence base for such a paradigm shift beyond the application of modern educational theory?
机译:基于问题的学习(PBL)于1995年在英国首次引入医学课程。1在美国医学总会(General Medical Council)的支持下,该委员会指出“现代教育理论和研究必须影响教与学” 2,现已被采用在英国大多数医学院校中,它是四所新的英语医学院中教学的核心组成部分。3人们认为PBL可以更好地为医生提供终身学习的装备,但这种范例转变已超越了传统医学。现代教育理论的应用?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号