首页> 外文期刊>Taiwanese journal of obstetrics and gynecology >A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two different strategies in advanced maternal age: Combined first-trimester screening and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing
【24h】

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two different strategies in advanced maternal age: Combined first-trimester screening and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing

机译:成本效益分析比较了晚期孕产妇的两种不同策略:孕早期筛查和孕产妇无血细胞DNA检测相结合

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To estimate cost efficacy of first-trimester screening strategies based on nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal blood cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in women with advanced maternal age (AMA). Materials and methods This was a retrospective population-based analysis of all pregnant women with AMA booked for combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) in China over a 3-year period. The assumed screening strategies were the following: cFTS (Strategy 1), cfDNA testing as a first-tier investigation replacing biomarkers after NT measurement (Strategy 2), and cfDNA testing combined with dating ultrasound for all women (Strategy 3). The direct costs were compared between strategies. Results Strategy 1 was completed in 6443 women with AMA. The respective detection rates were 94.5% and 90.9% for trisomies 21 and 18, with a total screen-positive rate of 13.5%. Such a policy resulted in 871 invasive tests and a total cost of $747,870 or a cost of $116 per person tested. Strategy 2 would result in a total cost of $1,812,570, or a cost of $281 per person tested, with increased detection rates for trisomies 21 and 18, and a decreased number of invasive tests compared with strategy 1. The total cost of Strategy 3 would be $1,675,430, or a cost of $260 per person tested with the least number of invasive tests. Conclusion The cfDNA modalities have the advantages of higher detection rate for common trisomies and lower screening-positive rate. However, the cost of cfDNA testing needs to decrease significantly if it is to replace the current cFTS practice in a population of AMA on a purely cost effectiveness basis.
机译:目的评估基于颈部半透明性(NT)和孕妇血液中无细胞DNA(cfDNA)检测的孕晚期孕妇(AMA)的早期妊娠策略的成本效益。材料和方法这是一项回顾性的,基于人口的回顾性分析,分析了在中国进行的为期3年的联合孕早期筛查(cFTS)的所有AMA孕妇。假定的筛选策略如下:cFTS(策略1),cfDNA测试作为第一级调查替代NT测量后的生物标记物(策略2),以及cfDNA测试结合约会超声波检查对所有女性(策略3)。比较了不同策略之间的直接成本。结果策略1在6443名患有AMA的女性中完成。三体21和18的检出率分别为94.5%和90.9%,总的筛查阳性率为13.5%。这项政策导致进行了871项侵入性检查,总费用为747,870美元,即每人接受检查的费用为116美元。策略2的总成本为1,812,570美元,或每人测试的成本为281美元,与策略1相比,三体症21和18的检出率提高,并且侵入性测试的数量减少。策略3的总成本为1,675,430美元,或者以最少的侵入性检查数量进行测试的人均费用为260美元。结论cfDNA检测方法具有较高的检出率,较低的筛查阳性率。但是,如果要完全根据成本效益来替代AMA人群中的现有cFTS做法,则cfDNA测试的成本需要大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号