首页> 外文期刊>QUT Law Review >THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST AS A REMEDY FOR MISTAKE, FRAUD, DURESS AND UNDUE
【24h】

THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST AS A REMEDY FOR MISTAKE, FRAUD, DURESS AND UNDUE

机译:建设性信任作为对错误,欺诈,顽固和不当行为的一种补救

获取原文
           

摘要

The constructive trust is gradually emerging in Anglo-Australian law as a very effective remedy for the specific restitution of property acquired by fraudulent, unconscionable or inequitable conduct. It is therefore appropriate to consider in more detail the general principles which are applied by the courts to determine whether a person holding title to property can be charged as a constructive trustee of the property because the property was acquired by fraudulent, unconscionable or inequitable conduct. It is also necessary to examine particular applications of these general principles. In this article the use of the constructive trust as a remedial device for restoring property acquired by mistake, fraud, duress and undue influence is considered as a specific category in which these general principles are applied as a justification for charging the holder of title to property as a constructive trustee of the property.
机译:建设性的信任在英澳法律中逐渐形成,作为对通过欺诈,不合情理或不公平行为获得的财产进行特定归还的非常有效的补救措施。因此,有必要更详细地考虑法院适用的一般原则,以确定拥有财产所有权的人是否可以被指控为财产的建设性受托人,因为该财产是通过欺诈,不合情理或不公平的行为获得的。还必须检查这些通用原理的特定应用。在本文中,使用建设性信托作为补救手段,以恢复由于错误,欺诈,胁迫和不当影响而获得的财产,被视为特定类别,在这些类别中,这些一般性原则可作为向财产所有权人收取费用的理由作为财产的建设性受托人。

著录项

  • 来源
    《QUT Law Review》 |1987年第3期|共21页
  • 作者

    M. Cope;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号