首页> 外文期刊>Universal Journal of Biomedical Engineering >Comparative Analysis of Different Prescriptive Formulae Used in the Evaluation of Real Ear Insertion Gain for Digital Hearing Aids
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Different Prescriptive Formulae Used in the Evaluation of Real Ear Insertion Gain for Digital Hearing Aids

机译:用于数字助听器的真实耳朵插入增益评估中不同说明性公式的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Various prescriptive procedures have been developed, for calculating the real ear insertion gain of a digital hearing aid based either on loudness equalization or speech intelligibility. But the problem for audiologists lies in selecting an appropriate procedure for particular types of hearing impairment. The aim of this work is to analyze various linear and nonlinear prescriptive procedures, by performing various audiological investigations on hearing impaired subjects, so as to select an optimum procedure for a specific type of impairment. An audiological test was carried out on 237 hearing impaired subjects in the age group of 23 to 75 years, and they were given appropriate hearing aids with gain recommendations, using different formulae by audiologists. The degrees of success of the recommended formulae were analyzed, based on the speech discrimination score. Subjects with mild and moderate losses were found satisfied with the gain suggestions of linear prescriptive procedures, in addition to procedures based on loudness equalization NAL-RP (National Acoustics Laboratory-Revised Profound), POGO II (prescription of Gain Output), and DSL (Desired Sensation Level). Subjects with sensorineural loss were satisfied only with the gain recommendations of non linear prescriptive procedures NAL-NL1 (National Acoustics Laboratory-Non Linear), NAL-NL2 and DSL I/O (Desired Sensation Level Input/Output). An appropriate prescriptive procedure for a specific audiogram could be successfully suggested in future based on the results obtained from the total population on whom the study was carried out. In the case of those subjects who were not satisfied with the suggested procedure, a revised formula would be arrived at, by suitably varying the gains by the audiologists.
机译:已经开发了各种说明性程序,用于基于响度均衡或语音清晰度来计算数字助听器的真实耳朵插入增益。但是听力学家的问题在于针对特定类型的听力障碍选择适当的程序。这项工作的目的是通过对听力受损的受试者进行各种听力学研究,分析各种线性和非线性的处方程序,从而针对特定类型的障碍选择最佳程序。对23位至75岁年龄段的237名听力障碍的受试者进行了听力测试,并由听力学家使用不同的公式为他们提供了适当的助听器,并提出了建议。基于语音辨别力分数,分析了推荐公式的成功程度。除了基于响度均衡NAL-RP(美国国家声学实验室修订的深刻见解),POGO II(增益输出的规定)和DSL(基于声音的均衡)的程序外,发现轻度和中度丢失的受试者还对线性说明性程序的增益建议感到满意。所需的感觉水平)。仅在非线性规范性程序NAL-NL1(美国国家声学实验室-非线性),NAL-NL2和DSL I / O(所需的感觉水平输入/输出)的增益建议下,患有感觉神经性丧失的受试者才会感到满意。将来可以根据从进行研究的总人口中获得的结果,成功地建议针对特定听力图的适当处方程序。对于那些对建议的程序不满意的受试者,可以通过适当地改变听力学家的增益来得出修正的公式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号