首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >Self-administration of a food security scale by adolescents: item functioning, socio-economic position and food intakes
【24h】

Self-administration of a food security scale by adolescents: item functioning, socio-economic position and food intakes

机译:青少年自我管理食物安全量表:项目功能,社会经济地位和食物摄入量

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of a six-item food security scale when self-administered by adolescents.DesignCross-sectional questionnaire survey including the six-item food security measure, socio-economic variables and a food-frequency questionnaire.SettingRepresentative sample of 29 schools in Trinidad.SubjectsIn total 1903 students aged approximately 16 years.ResultsItem affirmatives ranged from 514 (27%) for the a€?balanced meala€? item to 128 (7%) for the a€?skipped or cut meals oftena€? item and 141 (7%) for the a€?hungrya€? item. Item-score correlations ranged from 0.444 to 0.580. Cronbach's ?± was 0.77. Relative item severities from the Rasch model ranged from a?’1.622 (standard error 0.043) for the a€?balanced meala€? item to 1.103 (0.068) for the a€?skipped or cut meals oftena€? item and 0.944 (0.062) for the a€?hungrya€? item. The a€?hungrya€? item gave a slightly lower relative severity in boys than girls. Food insecurity was associated with household overcrowding (adjusted odds ratio comparing highest and lowest quartiles 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.75 to 3.91), lack of pipe-borne water in the home, low paternal education or paternal unemployment. After adjusting for socio-economic variables, food insecurity was associated with less frequent consumption of fruit (0.75, 0.60 to 0.94) or fish (0.72, 0.58 to 0.88) but more frequent consumption of biscuits or cakes (1.47, 1.02 to 2.11).ConclusionsThe food security scale provides a valid, reliable measure in adolescents, although young people report being hungry but not eating relatively more frequently than adults. Food-insecure adolescents have low socio-economic position and may eat less healthy diets.
机译:目的评估青少年自我管理的六项食品安全量表的信度和效度设计横断面问卷调查,包括六项食品安全措施,社会经济变量和食物频率问卷。设置代表性样本29特立尼达的一所学校中的对象总数为1903名年龄在16岁左右的学生。结果项目对均衡膳食的肯定值为514(占27%)。经常跳过或减少的餐点占128(7%)个项目项目和141(7%)的“ hungrya”?项目。项目得分的相关性介于0.444至0.580之间。克伦巴赫的±为0.77。来自Rasch模型的相对项目严重度范围为“平衡膳食”的“ 1.622”(标准误差0.043)。经常跳过或减少餐点的项目,请提高到1.103(0.068)项目,“ a”或“ hungrya”的价格为0.944(0.062)项目。 ????该项目的男孩相对严重程度略低于女孩。粮食不安全与家庭拥挤有关(调整后的比值比,比较最高和最低四分位数为2.61,95%的置信区间为1.75至3.91),家庭缺乏自来水,父亲教育程度低或父亲失业。在对社会经济变量进行调整后,粮食不安全与水果(0.75、0.60至0.94)或鱼类(0.72、0.58至0.88)的食用频率降低,但饼干或蛋糕的食用频率较高(1.47、1.02至2.11)相关。结论粮食安全量表为青少年提供了有效,可靠的衡量标准,尽管年轻人报告称其饥饿,但进食的频率没有成年人高。粮食不安全的青少年的社会经济地位低下,可能少吃健康饮食。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号