首页> 外文期刊>Prostate International >Implications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair on open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy
【24h】

Implications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair on open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy

机译:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对开放,腹腔镜和机器人根治性前列腺切除术的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose There have been anecdotal reports of surgeons having to abandon radical prostatectomy (RP) after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) due to obliteration of tissue planes by mesh. Nodal dissection may also be compromised. We prospectively collected data from four experienced prostate surgeons from separate institutions. Our objective was to evaluate the success rate of performing open RP (ORP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robotic assisted RP (RALRP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after LIHR, and the frequency of complications. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases of men who underwent RP after LIHR between 2004 and 2010 at four institutions was undertaken. The data recorded included age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, preoperative Gleason score, and clinical stage. The operative approach, success or failure to perform RP, success or failure to perform PLND, pathological stage, and complications were also recorded. Results A total of 1,181 men underwent RP between 2004 and 2010. Fifty-seven patients (4.8%) underwent RP after LIHR. An ORP was attempted in 19 patients, LRP in 33, and RALRP in 5. All 57 cases were able to be successfully completed. Ten of the 18 open PLND were able to be completed (55.6%). Four of the 22 laparoscopic LND were able to be completed (18.2%). Robotic LND was possible in 5 of 5 cases (100%). Therefore, it was not possible to complete a LND 56.8% of patients. Complications were limited to ten patients. These complications included one LRP converted to ORP due to failure to progress, and one rectourethral fistula in a salvage procedure post failed high intensity focused ultrasound. Conclusions LIHR is an increasingly common method of treating inguinal hernias. LIHR is not a contra-indication to RP. However PLND may not be possible in over 50% of patients who have had LIHR. Therefore, these patients may be under-staged and under treated.
机译:目的已有轶事报道,由于网状组织平面的堵塞,外科医生在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)后不得不放弃根治性前列腺切除术(RP)。淋巴结清扫术也可能受到损害。我们前瞻性地收集了来自不同机构的四名经验丰富的前列腺外科医生的数据。我们的目标是评估LIHR后进行开放式RP(ORP),腹腔镜RP(LRP)和机器人辅助RP(RALRP)和盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)的成功率,以及并发症的发生频率。方法回顾性分析了2004年至2010年在四个机构进行LIHR后接受RP的男性前瞻性数据库。记录的数据包括年龄,术前前列腺特异性抗原,术前格里森评分和临床分期。还记录了手术方法,执行RP的成功或失败,执行PLND的成功或失败,病理分期和并发症。结果2004年至2010年间,共有1181名男性接受了RP。LIHR后有57例患者(4.8%)接受了RP。尝试进行ORP治疗19例,尝试LRP治疗33例,尝试RALRP治疗5例。 18个开放的PLND中有10个可以完成(55.6%)。 22例腹腔镜LND中有4例可以完成(18.2%)。 5例病例中有5例(100%)可能发生机器人LND。因此,不可能完成56.8%的LND患者。并发症仅限于十例患者。这些并发症包括由于进展失败而将一个LRP转换为ORP,以及在高强度聚焦超声治疗失败后的抢救过程中出现了一个rec脑瘘。结论LIHR是治疗腹股沟疝的一种越来越普遍的方法。 LIHR不是RP的禁忌症。但是,在超过50%的LIHR患者中PLND可能无法实现。因此,这些患者可能处于阶段不足和治疗不足的状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号