首页> 外文期刊>Preventing chronic disease >Barriers to Diabetes Self-management Education Programs in Underserved Rural Arkansas: Implications for Program Evaluation
【24h】

Barriers to Diabetes Self-management Education Programs in Underserved Rural Arkansas: Implications for Program Evaluation

机译:服务不足的农村阿肯色州糖尿病自我管理教育计划的障碍:对计划评估的启示

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundDiabetes prevalence has reached epidemic proportions. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) has been shown to improve preventive care practices and clinical outcomes. In this study, we discuss the barriers faced during the implementation of DSME programs in medically underserved rural areas of Arkansas.ContextArkansas is a rural state, with most southeastern counties experiencing a shortage of health care professionals. The Arkansas Diabetes Prevention and Control Program and its partners established 12 DSME programs in underserved counties with a high prevalence of diabetes.MethodsDSME programs were delivered by a registered nurse and a dietitian who provided 10 to 13 hours of education to each program participant. Baseline, 6-month, and year-end data were collected on preventive care practices, such as daily blood glucose monitoring, foot examination, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and glycosylated hemoglobin level, among the participants in newly established DSME programs.ConsequencesOf the 12 DSME programs established, 11 received American Diabetes Association recognition. The number of participants in the DSME programs increased 138% in 1 year, from 308 in February 2003 to 734 in March 2004. Preventive care practices improved: daily blood glucose monitoring increased from 56% to 67% of participants, and daily foot examinations increased from 63% to 84% of participants. Glycosylated hemoglobin decreasedby an average of 0.5 units per participant who completed the program. However, many anticipated and a few unanticipated barriers during the implementation of the program could not be overcome because of the lack of an evaluation plan.InterpretationAlthough results point to potential benefits of preventive care practices among DSME participants, interpretation of findings was limited by sample size. Sample size limitations are traced to barriers to assessing program outcome. Program evaluation should be integrated into the planning phase to ensure adequate measures of program effectiveness.
机译:背景糖尿病的流行已达到流行病的程度。糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)已被证明可以改善预防保健措施和临床结果。在这项研究中,我们讨论了在医疗服务不足的阿肯色州农村地区实施DSME计划时面临的障碍。背景阿肯色州是一个乡村州,东南部大多数县都缺少医疗保健专业人员。阿肯色州糖尿病预防和控制计划及其合作伙伴在糖尿病患病率高的服务欠缺县建立了12个DSME计划。方法DSME计划由注册护士和营养师提供,他们为每个计划参与者提供10至13个小时的教育。在新建立的DSME计划的参与者中,收集了有关预防性护理措施的基线,6个月和年底数据,例如日常血糖监测,足部检查,收缩压和舒张压以及糖基化血红蛋白水平。建立了12个DSME计划,其中11个获得了美国糖尿病协会的认可。 DSME计划的参与者人数在1年中增加了138%,从2003年2月的308人增加到2004年3月的734人。预防保健措施得到了改善:每日血糖监测从参与者的56%增加到67%,并且每天进行脚部检查从63%到84%的参与者。糖化血红蛋白平均每个完成该计划的参与者减少0.5个单位。但是,由于缺乏评估计划,无法克服计划实施过程中的许多预期障碍和一些意料之外的障碍。解释尽管结果表明DSME参与者预防性护理实践的潜在好处,但对结果的解释受到样本量的限制。样本数量的限制可追溯到评估计划结果的障碍。计划评估应纳入计划阶段,以确保适当地衡量计划有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号