首页> 外文期刊>Primary health care research & development. >Elderly patients’ and GPs’ perspectives of patient–GP communication concerning polypharmacy: a qualitative interview study
【24h】

Elderly patients’ and GPs’ perspectives of patient–GP communication concerning polypharmacy: a qualitative interview study

机译:老年患者和全科医生关于多药的患者-全科医生沟通的观点:定性访谈研究

获取原文

摘要

AimThe aim of this study was to explore elderly patients’ and general practitioners’ (GPs’) perceptions of communication about polypharmacy, medication safety and approaches for empowerment.BackgroundTo manage polypharmacy, GPs need to know patients’ real medication consumption. However, previous research has shown that patients do not always volunteer all information about their medication regimen, for example, such as the intake of over-the-counter medication or the alteration or discontinuation of prescribed medication.MethodA qualitative interview study including patients of at least 65 years old with polypharmacy (?5 medications) and their GPs in a German Primary Healthcare Centre. The transcripts from the semi-structured interviews (n=6 with patients; n=3 with GPs) were analysed using a framework analytical approach.FindingsWe identified three themes: differing medication plans: causes?; dialogue concerning medication: whose responsibility?; supporting patients’ engagement: how? While GPs stated that patients do not always report or might even conceal information, all patients reported that they could speak openly about everything with their GPs. In this context, trust might act as a double-edged sword, as it can promote open communication but also prevent patients from asking questions. Both GPs and patients could name very few ways in which patients could be supported to become more informed and active in communication concerning polypharmacy and medication safety.ConclusionThis study shows that patients’ awareness of the significance of their active role in addressing polypharmacy needs to be increased. This includes understanding that trusting the doctor does not preclude asking questions or seeking more information. Thus, interventions which improve patients’ communication skills and address specific issues of polypharmacy, particularly in elderly patients, should be designed. GPs might support patients by ‘inviting’ their contribution.
机译:目的本研究的目的是探讨老年患者和全科医生(GPs)关于多药房,药物安全性和赋权方法的沟通观念。背景要管理多药房,GP必须了解患者的实际用药量。但是,以前的研究表明,患者并不总是自愿提供有关其用药方案的所有信息,例如,服用非处方药或更改或停用处方药等方法。至少65岁,在德国一家初级医疗中心拥有多药店(5种药物)及其全科医生。使用框架分析方法对半结构式访谈(患者为n = 6;全科医生为n = 3)的成绩单进行了分析。发现我们确定了三个主题:不同的用药计划:原因?关于药物的对话:谁负责?支持患者参与:如何?尽管全科医生表示患者并非总是报告甚至可能隐藏信息,但所有患者都报告说他们可以与全科医生公开谈论一切。在这种情况下,信任可以充当一把双刃剑,因为它可以促进开放式沟通,但也可以防止患者提出问题。全科医生和患者都很少提出支持患者在多药和药物安全方面进行更充分信息和积极沟通的方法。结论本研究表明,患者对在解决多药问题中发挥积极作用的重要性的意识需要增强。这包括理解信任医生并不排除提出问题或寻求更多信息的可能性。因此,应该设计出可以改善患者沟通技巧并解决多药店特定问题的干预措施,尤其是针对老年患者。全科医生可以通过“邀请”他们的贡献来支持患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号