首页> 外文期刊>Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology >Links Between Mythology and Philosophy: Homer’s Iliad and Current Criteria of Rationality
【24h】

Links Between Mythology and Philosophy: Homer’s Iliad and Current Criteria of Rationality

机译:神话与哲学之间的联系:荷马的伊利亚特和当前的合理性标准

获取原文

摘要

It is usually said that there is a clear difference between pre-philosophical texts such as Homer’s Iliad and what is provided in the fragments corresponding to first philosophers such as Thales of Miletus. This paper tries to show that this is not undoubtedly so, and it does that by means of the analysis of a fragment of the Iliad in which Hypnos is speaking. In this way, the main argument is that, while the fragment can be interpreted both in a literal and in a metaphorical or poetic sense, in both of those cases it can be thought that it is related to philosophy or rational thinking. If the interpretation is literal, the fragment expresses an idea very akin to an important thesis by Thales of Miletus. On the other hand, if the interpretation is metaphorical or poetic, we have to assume, following several contemporary reasoning theories, that the fragment is essentially based on an evident rational inference.
机译:通常认为,荷马史诗《伊利亚特》等前哲学文本与米利都斯泰勒斯等第一批哲学家的文献片段之间存在明显的区别。本文试图证明这并非毫无疑问,它是通过分析Hypnos在讲的Iliad片段来做到这一点的。这样,主要论据是,虽然片段可以用字面意义和隐喻或诗意的意义来解释,但在这两种情况下,都可以认为它与哲学或理性思维有关。如果解释是字面的,则该片段表达的想法非常类似于Miletus Thales的重要论文。另一方面,如果解释是隐喻的或诗意的,则我们必须根据几种当代的推理理论,假设该片段基本上是基于明显的理性推论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号