首页> 外文期刊>Plant methods >Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves

机译:玉米叶片质外性蛋白提取方法的比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency of protocols was evaluated by comparing the protein patterns resolved by 1-DE and 2-DE, and revealed distinct characteristics for each infiltration solution. Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis of all fractions was applied to cover all proteins differentially extracted by infiltration solutions and led to the identification of 328 proteins in total in apoplast preparations. The predicted subcellular protein localisation distinguished the examined infiltration solutions in those with high or low amounts of intracellular protein contaminations, and with high or low quantities of secreted proteins. All tested infiltration solution extracted different subsets of proteins, and those implications on apoplast-specific studies are discussed.
机译:植物质外体中的蛋白质对于许多生理过程至关重要。我们已经分析并比较了六种不同的浸渗液,以检测质​​外体中所含的蛋白质,从而识别出最适合叶片的方法,并为每次提取建立蛋白质组图。通过比较1-DE和2-DE解析的蛋白质模式评估方案的效率,并揭示每种浸润溶液的独特特征。对所有馏分进行了Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS分析,以涵盖渗透溶液差异提取的所有蛋白质,从而鉴定了质外体制剂中总共328种蛋白质。预测的亚细胞蛋白质定位可区分出所检查的浸润溶液是那些具有高或低量的细胞内蛋白质污染以及高或低量的分泌蛋白的浸润溶液。所有测试的浸润溶液均提取了不同的蛋白质子集,并讨论了对质外体特异性研究的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号