...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao >Journals in action: an exploratory study - bibliometric in management, accounting and tourism
【24h】

Journals in action: an exploratory study - bibliometric in management, accounting and tourism

机译:行动期刊:一项探索性研究-管理,会计和旅游学文献计量

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper aims to carry out a bibliometric study of all periodic Administration, Accounting and Tourism (national), with a view to presenting the general provisions of these journals. Methodologically, classifies itself as a descriptive bibliometric study, supported by a document analysis done on the websites of all Magazines classified A1 to B5 by QUALIS / CAPES (Triennium 2009-2011). The process of data analysis was made using the techniques of content analysis and document analysis journals available digitally. The time frame was the year 2012, the average time of the field research was three months, given the complexity of the treatment of information. The data were treated by means of frequencies and tables and their discussions were descriptively, as brought to light various information not previously arranged this way in a scientific work. Among the main results have been the unpreparedness of some managements editorials in the process of monitoring and implementation of activities related to the editorial process. Evidence is a concentration of journals with higher qualification in the south and southeast. Few periodic high impact national perspective Finally, the existence of a mass production even in the field printed, limiting access to knowledge. Thus it is concluded that the journals should be constantly evaluated as to their insertions and range, as well as the watchword should be publicizing the acts and facts, as well as its monitoring and qualification of CAPES whose periodization is a factor limiting.
机译:本文旨在对所有定期行政,会计和旅游业(国家)进行文献计量研究,以介绍这些期刊的一般规定。方法论上,将自己分类为描述性书目研究,并由QUALIS / CAPES(2009-2011三年期)在所有分类为A1至B5的杂志的网站上进行文件分析。数据分析过程是使用内容分析技术和数字化可用的文档分析期刊进行的。时间安排是2012年,鉴于信息处理的复杂性,实地研究的平均时间为三个月。数据通过频率和表格进行处理,并对它们的讨论进行了描述性描述,从而揭示了以前在科学工作中未以这种方式安排的各种信息。主要结果之一是某些管理人员的社论在监测和执行与编辑过程有关的活动的过程中不够准备。证据是南部和东南部具有较高资格的期刊的集中。很少有周期性的,具有高影响力的国家观点最后,即使在印刷现场也存在大规模生产,这限制了知识的获取。因此得出的结论是,应该对期刊的插入和范围进行不断评估,并且应该使用口号来宣传期刊的行为和事实,以及对CAPES的监视和限定,因为CAPES的定期性是一个限制因素。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号