...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Efficacy of Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation in Acute/Subacute Zoster-Related Pain: A Retrospective Study
【24h】

Efficacy of Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation in Acute/Subacute Zoster-Related Pain: A Retrospective Study

机译:急性/亚急性带状疱疹相关疼痛短期脊髓刺激的疗效:回顾性研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a refractory condition that impairs the patient’s quality of life (QoL), it develops secondary to herpes zoster infection. Therefore, it’s important to prevent the transition of acute/subacute zoster-related pain to PHN. Despite of numerous studies, the optimal intervention that reduces PHN incidence is still unknown.OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the efficacy of short-term spinal cord stimulation (stSCS) in patients with refractory acute/subacute zoster-related pain.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.SETTING: Tertiary referral center/teaching hospital.METHODS: A total of 46 patients who presented with acute/subacute zoster-related pain, and had previously failed conventional therapies, underwent stSCS treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form Health Survey 12 items (SF-12), and analgesic consumptions were recorded before stSCS, post-stSCS, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after stimulation.RESULTS: The VAS scores at post-stSCS, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after stSCS treatment were significantly decreased compared with the baseline score (P < 0.001). Thirty-two patients (69.6%, 32/46) achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), including 18 patients (39.1%, 18/46) who achieved complete pain relief (VASless than orequal to2). During the follow-up period, the efficacy of stSCS didn’t decrease and VAS scores were declining. Similarly, SF-12 scores and analgesic consumptions improved after stSCS treatment. The efficacy of stSCS did not differ significantly among patients with different durations of acute/subacute zoster-related pain starting from the onset of rash. No serious adverse effects were observed in the entire follow-up period.LIMITATIONS: This study was not a randomized prospective controlled study. We did not compare the outcomes with patients presenting with mild or moderate pain, and did not compare the efficacy of stSCS treatment with conventional therapies.CONCLUSIONS: stSCS is a safe, effective, and less invasive analgesic method for patients with refractory acute/subacute zoster-related pain.KEY WORDS: Herpes zoster, zoster-related pain, postherpetic neuralgia, spinal cord stimulation, VAS
机译:背景:带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)是一种难治性疾病,会损害患者的生活质量(QoL),继发于带状疱疹感染。因此,重要的是要防止与带状疱疹相关的急性/亚急性疼痛转变为PHN。尽管进行了大量研究,降低PHN发生率的最佳干预措施仍然未知。目的:我们评估短期脊髓刺激(stSCS)在难治性急性/亚急性带状疱疹相关性疼痛患者中的疗效。研究设计:回顾性研究。单位:三级转诊中心/教学医院方法:总共46例出现急性/亚急性带状疱疹相关性疼痛,并且以前传统疗法无效的患者,接受了stSCS治疗。视觉模拟量表(VAS),简式健康调查12项(SF-12)和镇痛剂消耗量在刺激前,刺激后2周,刺激后1周,1、3、6、9和12个月记录。 :stSCS治疗后,治疗2周以及治疗后2周,1、3、6、9和12个月的VAS评分均较基线评分显着降低(P <0.001)。 32例患者(69.6%,32/46)达到了最小的临床重要差异(MCID),其中18例患者(39.1%,18/46)完全缓解了疼痛(VAS小于等于2)。在随访期间,stSCS的疗效没有下降,VAS分数也在下降。同样,经stSCS治疗后,SF-12评分和镇痛剂用量有所改善。从皮疹发作开始,具有不同持续时间的急性/亚急性带状疱疹相关疼痛的患者中,stSCS的疗效无显着差异。在整个随访期间均未观察到严重的不良反应。限制:该研究不是一项随机的前瞻性对照研究。我们没有将轻度或中度疼痛患者的结局进行比较,也没有将stSCS治疗与传统疗法的疗效进行比较。结论:stSCS是难治性急性/亚急性带状疱疹患者的一种安全,有效且微创的镇痛方法关键词:带状疱疹;带状疱疹相关的疼痛;带状疱疹后神经痛;脊髓刺激; VAS

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号