...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Successful Long-term Nerve Root Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Real World, Single Center Canadian Experience
【24h】

Successful Long-term Nerve Root Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Real World, Single Center Canadian Experience

机译:成功的长期神经根刺激治疗慢性神经性疼痛:真实世界,加拿大单中心经验

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain in the lower limbs. However, some patients have pain in distributions that are difficult to target specifically and consistently with SCS. This often involves pain in the groin or upper limbs, or pain limited to a specific dermatome. We hypothesized that dorsal nerve root stimulation (DNRS) would provide similar pain relief for these patients, compared to our results using SCS.OBJECTIVES: In this study we report our experience treating patients with chronic neuropathic pain using SCS and DNRS.STUDY DESIGN: Open label, prospective study that includes all patients treated with a new trial stimulator system at a single center between July 1, 2011, and October 31, 2013.SETTING: Academic university neurosurgical pain center.METHODS: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients had trials of spinal stimulation. Seventy-six patients went on to permanent implants, of which 26 received only DNRS, 47 only SCS, and 3 both. The technique was selected based on clinical assessment and intraoperative test stimulation. Other than pain location and diagnosis, the DNRS and SCS groups had similar baseline characteristics. Follow-up is reported at 12 months. Patients were assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the SF-36 for quality of life, and the morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD).RESULTS: At 12 months, the average VAS score for the DNRS group had decreased from 7.5 (SD 1.4) to 4.4 (SD 2.6) and 47% of patients with permanent implants achieved > 50% pain reduction. There were improvements in all subscores and component summary scores of the SF-36. The MEDD had been reduced in 55% of the patients with available data. There was no significant difference in complication or revision rates between the 2 groups.LIMITATIONS: Patients were not randomized to treatment groups, and instead were assigned to SCS or DNRS based on what was expected to provide superior pain coverage. There is incomplete follow-up data for some patients due to missed clinic visits.CONCLUSIONS: In our study, DNRS provided excellent pain reduction, quality of life improvement, and opioid medication use decreases. We conclude that it is an effective long-term treatment for chronic neuropathic pain.Key words: Spinal cord stimulation, dorsal nerve root stimulation, lumbar, thoracic, cervical, neuropathic pain, neuromodulation, clinical effectiveness, chronic pain, visual analogue scale
机译:背景:脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种公认​​的下肢慢性神经性疼痛的治疗方法。但是,有些患者在分配方面存在疼痛,很难用SCS明确地和始终如一地确定目标。这通常涉及腹股沟或上肢疼痛或仅限于特定皮肤刀的疼痛。我们假设与我们使用SCS的结果相比,背神经根刺激(DNRS)可以为这些患者提供类似的疼痛缓解目标:在这项研究中,我们报告了使用SCS和DNRS治疗慢性神经性疼痛患者的经验。标签,前瞻性研究,包括所有在2011年7月1日至2013年10月31日期间在一个中心接受新的试验刺激系统治疗的患者。背景:学术大学神经外科疼痛中心方法:连续132例患者进行了试验脊柱刺激。 76例患者进行了永久性植入,其中26例仅接受了DNRS,47例仅接受了SCS,两者均接受了3例。根据临床评估和术中测试刺激选择该技术。除疼痛部位和诊断外,DNRS和SCS组的基线特征相似。据报道随访时间为12个月。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的疼痛程度,SF-36评估生活质量以及吗啡当量日剂量(MEDD)。结果:DNRS组在12个月时的平均VAS评分从7.5(SD 1.4)至4.4(SD 2.6)的患者中,有47%的永久性植入物患者的疼痛减轻> 50%。 SF-36的所有子评分和所有组件的总评分都有所提高。现有数据显示,有55%的患者降低了MEDD。两组之间的并发症或翻修率没有显着差异。局限性:患者没有被随机分配到治疗组,而是根据期望提供更好的疼痛覆盖率被分配为SCS或DNRS。结论:DNRS在我们的研究中提供了出色的止痛效果,改善了生活质量,减少了阿片类药物的使用,因此一些患者的随访数据不完整。结论:这是长期有效的治疗慢性神经性疼痛的方法。关键词:脊髓刺激,背神经根刺激,腰椎,胸,颈椎,神经性疼痛,神经调节,临床疗效,慢性疼痛,视觉模拟量表

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号