首页> 外文期刊>Neuromodulation: journal of the International Neuromodulation Society >Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Brachial Plexus Nerve Roots and Supra‐Scapular Nerve for Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain of the Upper Limb
【24h】

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Brachial Plexus Nerve Roots and Supra‐Scapular Nerve for Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain of the Upper Limb

机译:外周神经刺激臂丛丛神经根和上肩神经的慢性难治性神经性疼痛的上肢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives We report the outcome of a consecutive series of 26 patients suffering from chronic medically‐refractory neuropathic pain of the upper limb (including 16 patients with complex regional pain syndrome), topographically limited, treated by brachial plexus (BP) nerve roots or supra‐scapular nerve (SSN) peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). Materials and Methods The technique consisted in ultrasound‐guided percutaneous implantation of a cylindrical lead (Pisces‐Quad, Medtronic) close to the SSN or the cervical nerve roots within the BP, depending on the pain topography. All the patients underwent a positive trial stimulation before lead connection to a subcutaneous stimulator. Chronic bipolar stimulation mean parameters were: frequency 55.5 Hertz, voltage 1.17 Volts. The voltage was set below the threshold inducing muscle contractions or paresthesias. Results Two patients were lost immediately after surgery. At last follow‐up (mean 27.5 months), the 20 patients still using the stimulation experienced a mean pain relief of 67.1%. Seventeen patients were improved ≥50%, including 12 improved ≥70%. In 11 patients with a follow‐up 2 years, the mean pain relief was 68%. At last follow‐up, respectively, six out of the nine (67%) patients treated by SSN stimulation and 10 out of 17 patients (59%) treated by BP stimulation were improved ≥50%. At last follow‐up, 12 out of 20 patients still using the stimulation were very satisfied, six were satisfied, and two were poorly satisfied. Complications were: stimulation intolerance due to shock‐like sensations (three cases), superficial infection (1), lead fractures (2), and migration (1). Conclusion In this pilot study, SSN or BP roots PNS provided a relatively safe, durable and effective option to control upper limb neuropathic pain.
机译:目的我们报告连续26例患有慢性医学 - 难治性神经病疼痛的连续26名患者的结果(包括16例复杂的区域疼痛综合征患者),地拓扑丛(BP)神经根或同上处理肩胛神经(SSN)周围神经刺激(PNS)。根据疼痛形貌,材料和方法由靠近SSN内的圆柱形引线(Pisces-Quad,Medtronic)的超声引导的技术经皮(Pisces-Quad,Medtronic)组成。所有患者在与皮下刺激器的铅连接之前接受了阳性试验刺激。慢性双极刺激平均参数是:频率为55.5赫兹,电压1.17伏特。将电压设定在诱导肌肉收缩或热感的阈值以下。结果手术后立即丢失两名患者。最后随访(平均27.5个月),20名患者仍在使用刺激的患者经历了平均疼痛缓解67.1%。十七例患者提高≥50%,其中12例提高≥70%。在11名后续患者中,2年来,平均疼痛缓解为68%。在最后一次随访中,SSN刺激治疗的九(67%)患者中有六个患者,通过BP刺激治疗的17名患者中的10例(59%)≥50%。最后随访,20名患者中的12例仍然使用刺激非常满意,满足六个,两个人满意得不好。并发症是:由于冲击性感觉(三种情况),浅表感染(1),铅骨折(2)和迁移(1),刺激不耐受。结论在该试点研究中,SSN或BP ROOTS PNS提供了一种相对安全,耐用且有效的选择来控制上肢神经性疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号