首页> 外文期刊>Patient Related Outcome Measures >London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy: guidance for its use as an outcome measure
【24h】

London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy: guidance for its use as an outcome measure

机译:伦敦计划外怀孕量度:将其用作结果量度的指南

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a psychometrically validated measure of the degree of intention of a current or recent pregnancy. The LMUP is increasingly being used worldwide, and can be used to evaluate family planning or -preconception care programs. However, beyond recommending the use of the full LMUP scale, there is no published guidance on how to use the LMUP as an outcome measure. Ordinal logistic regression has been recommended informally, but studies published to date have all used binary logistic regression and dichotomized the scale at different cut points. There is thus a need for evidence-based guidance to provide a standardized methodology for multivariate analysis and to enable comparison of results. This paper makes recommendations for the regression method for analysis of the LMUP as an outcome measure. Materials and methods: Data collected from 4,244 pregnant women in Malawi were used to compare five regression methods: linear, logistic with two cut points, and ordinal logistic with either the full or grouped LMUP score. The recommendations were then tested on the original UK LMUP data. Results: There were small but no important differences in the findings across the regression models. Logistic regression resulted in the largest loss of information, and assumptions were violated for the linear and ordinal logistic regression. Consequently, robust standard errors were used for linear regression and a partial proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model attempted. The latter could only be fitted for grouped LMUP score. Conclusion: We recommend the linear regression model with robust standard errors to make full use of the LMUP score when analyzed as an outcome measure. Ordinal logistic regression could be considered, but a partial proportional odds model with grouped LMUP score may be required. Logistic regression is the least-favored option, due to the loss of information. For logistic regression, the cut point for un/planned pregnancy should be between nine and ten. These recommendations will standardize the analysis of LMUP data and enhance comparability of results across studies.
机译:背景:伦敦计划外怀孕量度(LMUP)是对当前或最近怀孕的意向程度进行心理计量学验证的量度。 LMUP在世界范围内越来越多地被使用,并且可以用于评估计划生育或孕前保健计划。但是,除了建议使用完整的LMUP量表之外,没有关于如何将LMUP用作结果度量的已发布指南。非正式地建议使用序数逻辑回归,但是迄今为止发表的研究都使用了二进制逻辑回归,并在不同的切入点将量表二等分。因此,需要基于证据的指导,以提供用于多变量分析的标准化方法并能够比较结果。本文为回归方法提出了建议,以将LMUP作为结果度量进行分析。资料和方法:使用从马拉维的4,244名孕妇中收集的数据来比较五种回归方法:线性,具有两个切点的逻辑模型,以及具有完整或分组LMUP得分的有序逻辑模型。然后,对建议进行了原始的英国LMUP数据测试。结果:在各个回归模型中,发现的差异很小但没有重要差异。 Logistic回归导致最大的信息损失,并且违反了线性和有序Logistic回归的假设。因此,将鲁棒的标准误用于线性回归,并尝试使用部分比例赔率序数逻辑回归模型。后者仅适用于分组的LMUP得分。结论:我们建议将线性回归模型具有可靠的标准误差,以便在将其作为结果度量进行分析时充分利用LMUP得分。可以考虑按序逻辑回归,但是可能需要使用部分成组的LMUP分数比例赔率模型。由于信息丢失,逻辑回归是最不受欢迎的选择。对于逻辑回归,意外/计划怀孕的分界点应在9到10之间。这些建议将使LMUP数据的分析标准化,并增强整个研究结果的可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号