首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
【24h】

Postoperative Longitudinal Outcomes in Patients with Residual Disc Fragments after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

机译:经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术后残余椎间盘碎片患者的术后纵向结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Residual disc fragments are observed on immediate postoperativemagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2.8–15% of patients after percutaneousendoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Considering the known postoperativelongitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc tissue, a ‘watchful waiting’strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation in patients with asymptomaticresidual disc material.Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the longitudinal clinicaloutcomes between PELD patients in whom the complete removal of disc fragmentswas achieved (complete group) and those in whom residual disc fragments wereobserved on postoperative MRI (residual group).Study Design: Retrospective nested case-control study.Methods: A total of 225 patients were included (complete group, n=187 andresidual group, n=38). Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analogpain score for the leg (VAS-L, x/10) and back (VAS-B, x/10) and the Korean version ofthe Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI, x/45). A linear mixed-effects model was usedto analyze changes during the first 24 postoperative months.Results: One month after surgery, significant improvements in the VAS-L, VAS-B andK-ODI values were observed and were maintained during the first 24 postoperativemonths. No differences in these changes were noted between the groups. Early reoperation (during the first 3 postoperative months) was performed in 3 patients inthe residual group (7.9%) and in 4 patients in the complete group (2.1%) (P = 0.10).Limitations: First, the study design was retrospective. Moreover, the number ofpatients was relatively small and therefore insufficient to achieve robust statisticalpower. Second, we did not explore the radiological outcomes in patients withasymptomatic residual disc material because follow-up MRI was only obtained todocument symptom recurrence.Conclusion: When residual disc tissue is observed in asymptomatic patients, a‘watchful waiting’ strategy may be preferable to immediate re-operation. However,an increased early re-operation rate is expected for patients with residual disc tissue.
机译:背景:经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术(PELD)后,在术后2.83%至15%的患者中,在即时磁共振成像(MRI)上观察到残留的椎间盘碎片。考虑到残余椎间盘组织患者的已知纵向术后结局,对于无症状残余椎间盘材料的患者,“观察等待”策略可能比立即再次手术更为可取。目的:本研究的目的是比较PELD患者之间的纵向临床结果方法:回顾性巢式病例对照研究方法:总共纳入225例患者(完成),其中完全切除椎间盘碎片的患者(完全组)和术后MRI观察到残留椎间盘碎片的患者(残余组)。组,n = 187和残基,n = 38)。使用腿部(VAS-L,x / 10)和背部(VAS-B,x / 10)的视觉类似疼痛评分和韩文版的Oswestry残疾指数(K-ODI,x / 45)进行临床评估。结果:术后1个月,观察到VAS-L,VAS-B和K-ODI值有显着改善,并在术后24个月内得以维持。两组之间在这些变化上没有差异。残余组中的3例患者(7.9%)进行了早期再手术(在术后3个月内),完整组中的4例患者(2.1%)进行了早期再手术(P = 0.10)。局限性:首先,研究设计是回顾性的。此外,患者人数相对较少,因此不足以获得强大的统计能力。其次,我们没有探讨无症状残留椎间盘材料的放射学结果,因为仅获得随访MRI来记录症状复发。结论:当在无症状患者中观察到残留椎间盘组织时,“观察等待”策略可能比立即治疗更可取重新手术。但是,对于残留椎间盘组织的患者,预期其早期再手术率会提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号