...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan’s hemorrhoidectomy
【24h】

Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan’s hemorrhoidectomy

机译:LigaSure痔切除术与传统Milligan Morgan痔切除术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the efficacy of haemorrhoidectomy done by using LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.Methods: This randomized controlled trial was done at Department of Surgery Dow University Hospital Karachi during January 2013 to September 2015. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to group A (Haemorrhoidectomy by Ligasure) and group B (Milligan Morgan Haemorrhoiectomy). Efficacies of both procedures were compared by operative time, Blood loss, wound healing, and pain score on immediate, 1st and 7th post operative day.Results: Out of total 55 patients 23 were male and 32 were females. The most common group of age involved was between 40 – 60 years. Third degree Heamorrhoids were present in 37 (67.3%) of patients while remaining 18 (32.7%) had fourth degree Heamorrhoids. Group A included 29 cases while Group B included 26 cases. The mean operating time of Group A was 52.5 with standard deviation of 11.9 while it was 36.6±9.8 in the other group. The mean blood loss in group A was 51.92 with standard deviation of 15.68 while it was 70.34±25.59 in group B. Overall pain score was less in those patients who underwent Heamorrhoidectomy by Ligasure method.Conclusion: The efficacy of Heamorrhoidectomy by Ligasure is better than the traditional Milligan Morgan Heamorrhoidectomy but we need more clinical trials with large sample size and long term follow ups.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9976How to cite this:Bakhtiar N, Moosa FA, Jaleel F, Qureshi NA, Jawaid M. Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan’s hemorrhoidectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(3):657-661. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9976This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:比较使用LigaSure和传统的Milligan Morgan痔切除术进行痔切除术的疗效。方法:该随机对照试验于2013年1月至2015年9月在美国陶氏大学外科医院卡拉奇分部进行,共纳入55例患者。研究。将患者随机分为A组(Ligasure痔切除术)和B组(Milligan Morgan痔切除术)。通过手术时间,术后第1、7天的失血时间,失血量,伤口愈合情况和疼痛评分对两种方法的疗效进行比较。结果:55例患者中,男性23例,女性32例。最常见的年龄组在40至60岁之间。三度痔疮存在于37名患者中(67.3%),而其余18名患者(32.7%)具有四度痔疮。 A组包括29例,B组包括26例。 A组的平均手术时间为52.5,标准差为11.9,另一组为36.6±9.8。 A组平均失血为51.92分,标准差为15.68,B组为70.34±25.59分。采用Ligasure法行痔疮切除术的患者总体疼痛评分较低。结论:Ligasure法行痔疮切除术的疗效优于传统的Milligan Morgan痔切除术,但我们需要更多的具有大量样本且需要长期随访的临床试验。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9976如何引用此信息:Bakhtiar N,Moosa FA和Jaleel F,Qureshi NA,Jawaid M. LigaSure与常规Milligan Morgan痔切除术比较痔切除术。朴J医学。 2016; 32(3):657-661。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9976这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号