...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Comparison of Intra Nasal Midazolam Versus Ketamine as Premedication in 2-5 Years old Paeditric Surgery Patients
【24h】

Comparison of Intra Nasal Midazolam Versus Ketamine as Premedication in 2-5 Years old Paeditric Surgery Patients

机译:鼻内咪达唑仑与氯胺酮在2-5岁小儿手术患者中的用药比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Aim: Surgery and anesthesia can cause considerable distress and psychological consequences for children. In children, preanesthetic medications are frequently administered as pharmacologic adjuncts to help alleviate the stress and fear of surgery as well as to ease child-parental separation and promote a smooth induction of anesthesia. Oral, rectal, intravenous and intramuscular preanesthetic medication administration have been used. However, each route has disadvantages. Pre anaesthetic medication administered nasaly, due to its rapid and reliable onset of action, avoidance of painful injections and ease of administration have made it a convenient way to premedicate children. The aim of the present study is to compare the sedative effect of ketamine and midazolam administered nasaly as premedication. Patients and Methods: 130 children aged 2-5 years and with ASA class I-II randomly allocated in three groups and 20 minutes before operation time received either 0.2mg/kg midazolam or 5mg/kg ketamine or 2ml normal saline, intranasally. After administration of intranasal premedication the children were under direct observation of anesthesiology resident near their parents. At the time of separation and at the time of IV line insertion, on the basis of Sury and Cole sedation score they received a sedation score. Results: According to statistical analysis, at the time of separation from parents in midazolam group, 90% of patients were sedated (60% had mild sedation, 30% had good sedation), in ketamine group, 89% were sedated (32.5% had mild sedation, 59.5% had good sedation) while in placebo group, 47.5% showed sedation (40% mild, 7.5% good). At the time of intra venous line insertion, in midazolam group, 86% of patients were sedated (56% had mild sedation, 30% had good sedation), in ketamine group, 80% were sedated (57.5% had mild sedation, 22.5% had good sedation) while in placebo group 22.5% (20% had mild sedation, 2.5% had good sedation) showed sedation. Conclusion: On the basis of results midazolam and ketamine administered intra nasaly are effective in inducing sedation. Comparing these drugs with placebo, they are effective adjunctive premedicant.
机译:背景与目的:手术和麻醉会对孩子造成很大的困扰和心理后果。在儿童中,麻醉前药物经常作为药理学辅助手段给药,以减轻手术的压力和恐惧,并缓解儿童与父母之间的分离,并促进麻醉的顺利进行。已经使用了口服,直肠,静脉内和肌内麻醉前给药。但是,每种路线都有缺点。由于麻醉药的快速起效,起效快,避免痛苦的注射以及易于给药,因此在麻醉前使用麻醉药已成为麻醉儿童的简便方法。本研究的目的是比较氯胺酮和咪达唑仑在鼻腔给药前的镇静作用。患者和方法:130例2-5岁的ASA I-II级儿童,在手术时间前20分钟随机分为三组,鼻内接受0.2mg / kg咪达唑仑或5mg / kg氯胺酮或2ml生理盐水。给予鼻内用药后,对儿童进行直接观察,观察其父母附近的麻醉情况。在分离时和静脉输液时,根据Sury和Cole镇静分数,他们获得了镇静分数。结果:根据统计学分析,咪达唑仑组与父母分离时,有90%的患者镇静(60%轻度镇静,30%镇静良好),氯胺酮组的89%镇静(32.5%镇静)。轻度镇静,镇静效果良好(59.5%),而安慰剂组镇静(47%,轻度镇静,良好7.5%)占47.5%。静脉置管时,咪达唑仑组有86%的患者镇静(56%轻度镇静,30%镇静良好),氯胺酮组80%的镇静(57.5%轻度镇静,22.5%)。具有良好的镇静作用),而安慰剂组中有22.5%的镇静作用(20%具有轻度镇静作用,2.5%具有良好镇静作用)。结论:根据结果,鼻腔给药咪达唑仑和氯胺酮可有效诱导镇静作用。将这些药物与安慰剂进行比较,它们是有效的辅助辅助药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号