...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Pediatric tooth extractions under sedoanalgesia
【24h】

Pediatric tooth extractions under sedoanalgesia

机译:镇痛下的小儿拔牙

获取原文

摘要

Objective: The present study aims to evaluate intravenous ketamine and inhalation sedation in children, their unwanted side-effects and surgeon satisfaction.Methods: In this study, data of 922 children aged between 1-18 who underwent tooth extraction under sedoanalgesia in our department between September 2015-January 2016 were gathered and anesthesia approaches, unwanted side effects and surgical satisfaction was investigated. Postoperative recovery emergence agitation or delirium was evaluated with Watcha Behavior Scale (WBS).Results: Patients were grouped and compared according to acceptance of intravenous line placement (Group-1) or not (Group- 2). Group 1 received intravenous ketamine anesthesia (n=822), Group 2 received inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane (n=100). Number of patients, age, weight and gender was significantly different in two groups. When side effects were investigated nausea was observed in 30 patients (3.6%), skin rashes were observed in 26 patients (3.2%) in Group-1 while skin rashes were observed in one patient (1%) in Group 2. 95% of surgeons reported intravenous anesthesia, 18% of surgeons reported inhalation anesthesia to be the anesthesia of choice. Emergence of postoperative recovery agitation (WBS≥3) was observed more frequent in Group 2 (p<0.05) than Group 1.Conclusion: Ketamine, which has analgesic, hypnotic and amnestic effects and which does not alter pharyngeal and laryngeal reflexes thus minimizes aspiration possibility, is a safe and effective anesthetic agent for tooth extractions of the pediatric population under sedoanalgesia.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.325.10643How to cite this:Arpaci AH, Isik B. Pediatric tooth extractions under sedoanalgesia. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(5):1291-1295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.325.10643This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估儿童的静脉氯胺酮和吸入镇静作用,其不良副作用和外科医生的满意度。方法:本研究收集了我科922例1至18岁的儿童在进行痛觉镇痛下拔牙的数据。收集2015年9月至2016年1月的麻醉方法,不良副作用和手术满意度。用Watcha行为量表(WBS)评估术后恢复性躁动或del妄。结果:根据是否接受静脉输注(第1组)(第2组)对患者进行分组和比较。第一组接受静脉氯胺酮麻醉(n = 822),第二组接受七氟醚吸入麻醉(n = 100)。两组的患者人数,年龄,体重和性别差异显着。在调查副作用后,在第1组中有30例患者(3.6%)出现恶心,在第1组中有26例患者(3.2%)观察到皮疹,而在第2组中有1例患者(1%)观察到皮疹。外科医生报告静脉麻醉,18%的外科医生报告吸入麻醉是首选麻醉方法。与第1组相比,第2组的术后恢复性躁动发作(WBS≥3)的发生率更高(p <0.05)。一种可能是安全有效的麻醉药,适用于sedoanalgesia.doi下的儿科人群拔牙.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.325.10643如何引用此信息:Arpaci AH,Isik B.在seedanalgesia。朴J医学。 2016; 32(5):1291-1295。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.325.10643这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放获取文章,允许在任何媒体中无限制地使用,分发和复制,但要正确引用原始作品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号