首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Efficacy and safety of psychostimulants for amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of psychostimulants for amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:精神兴奋药对苯丙胺和甲基苯丙胺使用障碍的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders are associated with severe health and social consequences. No pharmacological therapy has been approved for the treatment of these disorders. Psychostimulants can act as maintenance-like therapies for managing substance use among these patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the literature examining the efficacy and safety of psychostimulant agents for increasing abstinence and treatment retention among patients with amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL from inception to August 2016. Selection of studies, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We conducted meta-analyses to provide a pooled summary estimate for included trials and report the review according to PRISMA guidelines. Results We identified and selected 17 studies with 1387 participants. Outcome reporting across trials was inconsistent, and the overall quality of evidence was very low due to high risk of bias and indirectness. A meta-analysis of five trials (642 participants) found no effect of psychostimulants for end-of-study abstinence (odds ratio?=?0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.45). Additionally, the pooled estimate from 14 studies (1184 participants) showed no effect of psychostimulants for treatment retention (odds ratio?=?1.20, 95% confidence interval?=?0.91 to 1.58). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between intervention and placebo groups based on qualitative reports from trials. Conclusions Quantitative analyses showed no effect of psychostimulants for sustained abstinence or treatment retention. We also identified the need for more rigorous studies in this research area with clinician and patient important outcomes.
机译:背景苯丙胺和甲基苯丙胺使用障碍与严重的健康和社会后果相关。没有药物疗法被批准用于治疗这些疾病。精神兴奋剂可以作为维持性疗法,用于管理这些患者中的药物使用。这项研究的目的是评估研究精神刺激药在苯丙胺和甲基苯丙胺使用障碍患者中增加戒断和治疗保留的功效和安全性的文献。方法从开始到2016年8月,我们对MEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycInfo,Cochrane Central和CINAHL进行了搜索。研究的选择,数据提取和偏倚评估的风险由两名审核员独立进行。我们进行了荟萃分析,以提供纳入试验的汇总摘要估计,并根据PRISMA指南报告评价。结果我们确定并选择了1387名参与者的17项研究。各个试验的结果报告不一致,并且由于偏见和间接风险较高,因此总体证据质量很低。对五项试验(642名参与者)的荟萃分析发现,精神兴奋剂对研究结束戒酒没有作用(几率?=?0.97,95%置信区间0.65至1.45)。此外,来自14项研究(1184名参与者)的汇总估算结果表明,精神刺激药对治疗保留率没有影响(几率≤1.20,95%置信区间≤0.91至1.58)。根据试验的定性报告,干预组和安慰剂组的严重不良事件发生率没有差异。结论定量分析显示精神刺激药对持续戒酒或治疗保留无效。我们还确定了在此研究领域中对临床医生和患者的重要结果进行更严格研究的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号