首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis
【24h】

Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis

机译:基于数据包络分析的高校社会科学研究可持续评价

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper divides the typical social scientific research process into two stages: the research development stage and the research innovation stage, with personnel as a shared input between them. We construct an input-shared multi-period two-stage DEA (data envelopment analysis) model as measurement of sustainability capacities of social scientific research, and then measure both the overall efficiencies and the stage efficiencies of scientific research of 18 HEIs (higher education institutions) in Jiangsu province of China from 2010 to 2014. There are some revelatory traits among the overall efficiencies and stage efficiencies of HEIs. As for the HEIs, the efficiencies of the first stage of certain HEIs that are better in social science are higher than those which have advantage in natural science. The results are the opposite in the second stage. Additionally, in virtue of common-weight global MPI (Malmquist Productivity Index), we figure out the dynamic efficiencies within and between HEIs. Finally, we appeal to administration departments to establish academic sharing systems and construct interdisciplinary ecosystems among HEIs, which aims to pool the knowledge, experience, and capacities of the region’s academic actors and improve the sustainable development and innovation abilities of social scientific research. In addition, collaborating with industrial organizations is also a strategic avenue to improve their research abilities, which can push the boundaries of sustainable development and also bring vigor in social scientific research.
机译:本文将典型的社会科学研究过程分为两个阶段:研究发展阶段和研究创新阶段,并由人员作为共同投入。我们构建了一个输入共享的多阶段两阶段DEA(数据包络分析)模型来衡量社会科学研究的可持续能力,然后衡量18个HEI(高等教育机构)的整体效率和阶段效率)从2010年到2014年在中国江苏省。高校的整体效率和阶段效率之间存在一些启示性的特征。至于高等教育机构,某些在社会科学方面表现更好的高等教育机构的第一阶段的效率要高于在自然科学领域中具有优势的那些机构。在第二阶段结果相反。此外,借助通用加权全球MPI(Malmquist生产力指数),我们可以得出HEI内部和之间的动态效率。最后,我们呼吁行政部门在高校之间建立学术共享体系并构建跨学科的生态系统,旨在汇集该地区学术参与者的知识,经验和能力,并提高社会科学研究的可持续发展和创新能力。此外,与产业组织的合作也是提高其研究能力的战略途径,它可以推动可持续发展的界限,也可以为社会科学研究带来活力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号