首页> 外文期刊>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy >Pain clinic definitions in the medical literature and U.S. state laws: an integrative systematic review and comparison
【24h】

Pain clinic definitions in the medical literature and U.S. state laws: an integrative systematic review and comparison

机译:医学文献和美国各州法律中对疼痛诊所的定义:系统的综合审查和比较

获取原文
       

摘要

In response to widespread opioid misuse, ten U.S. states have implemented regulations for facilities that primarily manage and treat chronic pain, called “pain clinics.” Whether a clinic falls into a state’s pain clinic definition determines the extent to which it is subject to oversight. It is unclear whether state pain clinic definitions model those found in the medical literature, and potential differences lead to discrepancies between scientific and professionally guided advice found in the medical literature and actual pain clinic practice. Identifying discrepancies could assist states to design laws that are more compatible with best practices suggested in the medical literature. We conducted an integrative systematic review to create a taxonomy of pain clinic definitions using academic medical literature. We then identified existing U.S. state pain clinic statutes and regulations and compared the developed taxonomy using a content analysis approach to understand the extent to which medical literature definitions are reflected in state policy. In the medical literature, we identified eight categories of pain clinic definitions: 1) patient case mix; 2) single-modality treatment; 3) multidisciplinary treatment; 4) interdisciplinary treatment; 5) provider supervision; 6) provider composition; 7) marketing; and 8) outcome. We identified ten states with pain clinic laws. State laws primarily include the following definitional categories: patient case mix; single-modality treatment, and marketing. Some definitional categories commonly found in the medical literature, such as multidisciplinary treatment and interdisciplinary treatment, rarely appear in state law definitions. This is the first study to our knowledge to develop a taxonomy of pain clinic definitions and to identify differences between pain clinic definitions in U.S. state law and medical literature. Future work should explore the impact of different legal pain clinic definitions on provider decision-making and state-level health outcomes.
机译:为了应对阿片类药物的广泛滥用,美国十个州已实施了有关主要管理和治疗慢性疼痛的设施(称为“疼痛诊所”)的法规。诊所是否属于州的痛苦诊所定义决定了对其进行监督的程度。目前尚不清楚州级疼痛诊所的定义是否可以模拟医学文献中的定义,并且潜在的差异会导致医学文献中发现的科学指导和专业指导建议与实际疼痛诊所实践之间存在差异。识别差异可以帮助各州设计与医学文献中建议的最佳实践更兼容的法律。我们进行了综合的系统评价,以使用学术医学文献创建疼痛临床定义的分类法。然后,我们确定了美国现行的州立疼痛诊所法规,并使用内容分析方法比较了已开发的分类法,以了解医学文献定义在州政策中的体现程度。在医学文献中,我们确定了八种疼痛临床定义:1)患者病例组合; 2)单模治疗; 3)多学科治疗; 4)跨学科治疗; 5)提供者监督; 6)提供者组成; 7)市场营销; 8)结果。我们通过疼痛诊所法确定了十个州。州法律主要包括以下定义类别:患者病例组合;单模治疗和营销。医学文献中常见的一些定义类别,例如多学科治疗和跨学科治疗,很少出现在州法律的定义中。这是我们所知的第一项研究,目的是建立疼痛诊所定义的分类法,并确定美国州法律和医学文献中疼痛诊所定义之间的差异。未来的工作应探讨不同法律疼痛诊所定义对提供者决策和州级健康结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号