首页> 外文期刊>Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business >Reducing Spatial Inequality In Indonesia: Off-The-Job Training As A Special Treatment For Underdeveloped Regions
【24h】

Reducing Spatial Inequality In Indonesia: Off-The-Job Training As A Special Treatment For Underdeveloped Regions

机译:减少印度尼西亚的空间不平等:在职培训作为欠发达地区的特殊待遇

获取原文
       

摘要

Education is one of Human Development Index (HDI) components which plays a vital role. Both theoretically and evidently speaking, the level of education has a positive correlation with income level. However, Indonesia as an archipelago country still can’t be able to provide equitable education for the whole country. Spatial Inequality is thought as the result of this problem. Since outer Java regions are less developed compared to Java, the quality of education is lower as well. The ability of education as income leverage factor is different between regions. Through this study, I compared the rate of return to schooling of both regions and analyze the causes. Furthermore, I examined the differences in the effects of formal education and job training on people in both regions. The aim is to decide what kind of human resources treatment is more effective for each region. This research’s data is collected from the National Labor Force Survey (SAKERNAS) 2014. I used modified Mincer earnings function to analyze the differences between regions. Cross-sectional regression analysis was done by using Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method. I split the data based on groups of the region to compare both rates of return to schooling. The results showed that there are differences in the rate of return to schooling between the two regions for each education level. The effect of training on income level also differs for both regions. Education gives a promising return to income in Java while job training doing it well in outer regions.
机译:教育是人类发展指数(HDI)的组成部分之一,起着至关重要的作用。从理论上和显然的角度来看,教育水平与收入水平都呈正相关。但是,印度尼西亚作为一个群岛国家,仍然无法为整个国家提供公平的教育。空间不平等被认为是此问题的结果。由于与Java相比,外部Java区域发展较差,因此教育质量也较低。教育作为收入杠杆因素的能力在不同地区之间是不同的。通过这项研究,我比较了两个地区的入学率,并分析了原因。此外,我研究了正规教育和职业培训对两个地区人民的影响的差异。目的是决定哪种人力资源处理方法对每个地区都更有效。这项研究的数据来自2014年美国国家劳动力调查(SAKERNAS)。我使用了经过修改的Mincer收益函数来分析区域之间的差异。通过使用普通最小二乘(OLS)方法进行横截面回归分析。我根据区域组对数据进行了划分,以比较两种入学率。结果表明,两个地区在每个教育水平上的返校率都有差异。培训对收入水平的影响在两个地区也不同。教育使Java的收入有希望获得回报,而在外围地区进行的职业培训则使收入得到了很好的回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号