首页> 外文期刊>South Asian Journal of Cancer >Safety and tolerability of Peg-grafeel?, a pegfilgrastim, for the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia: A prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance study in India
【24h】

Safety and tolerability of Peg-grafeel?, a pegfilgrastim, for the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia: A prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance study in India

机译:pegfilgrastim的Peg-grafeel?的安全性和耐受性,用于预防化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少和发热性中性粒细胞减少:印度的一项前瞻性,观察性,事后监测研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: A granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, pegfilgrastim, is efficacious though expensive for prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Biologics available and accessible today, having acceptable safety-efficacy profiles, require postapproval studies for better understanding of such drugs in clinical settings. Aim: This postmarketing surveillance study evaluated the safety of prophylactic Peg-grafeel? (pegfilgrastim) in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Settings and Design: This prospective, noninterventional, single-arm, open-label study was conducted at 10 study sites in India. Methods: Patients received subcutaneous 6 mg Peg-grafeel? approximately 24 h following chemotherapy as part of routine patient care. Statistical Analysis: Data were summarized descriptively. Results: The study included 250 patients (male: female = 36.4%:63.6%; median age, 54 [16–80] years). Most patients had Stage III (33.2%) or IV (41.6%) cancers and received cyclophosphamide (37.2%) and doxorubicin (31.6%) as chemotherapy. On an average, 4 Peg-grafeel? doses were administered per patient. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 115 (46%) patients, the most common being vomiting (11.6%), pain (11.2%), nausea (8.4%), and constipation (8.4%). Peg-grafeel?-related AEs included pain (3.2%), asthenia (2.4%), and arthralgia (1.2%). Bone pain (0.4%) and extremity pain (1.2%) were rare. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 4 (1.6%) and 3 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Serious AEs included vomiting (2.8%) and pyrexia (2%). No new safety concerns were identified. None of the five deaths was considered related to Peg-grafeel?. Conclusion: The overall safety profile of Peg-grafeel? was consistent with the expected safety profile of pegfilgrastim in patients with advanced malignancies in a clinical setting.
机译:背景:粒细胞集落刺激因子pegfilgrastim对化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少和发热性中性粒细胞减少症的预防性治疗虽然有效,但价格昂贵。如今,具有可接受的安全性-有效性特征的可用生物制剂需要进行批准后研究,以便在临床环境中更好地了解此类药物。目的:这项售后监测研究评估了预防性Peg-grafeel ?(pegfilgrastim)在化疗诱发的中性粒细胞减少症癌症患者中的安全性。设置与设计:这项前瞻性,非介入,单臂,开放标签的研究在印度的10个研究地点进行。方法:作为常规患者护理的一部分,患者在化疗后约24小时接受皮下6 mg Peg-grafeel ?皮下注射。统计分析:数据描述性地汇总。结果:该研究包括250名患者(男性:女性= 36.4%:63.6%;中位年龄为54 [16-80]岁)。大多数患者患有III期(33.2%)或IV期(41.6%)癌症,并接受环磷酰胺(37.2%)和阿霉素(31.6%)的化疗。每位患者平均要服用4粒Peg-grafeel ?剂量。 115例(46%)患者报告了治疗紧急不良事件(AEs),最常见的是呕吐(11.6%),疼痛(11.2%),恶心(8.4%)和便秘(8.4%)。 PEG-grafeel ?相关的不良事件包括疼痛(3.2%),乏力(2.4%)和关节痛(1.2%)。骨痛(0.4%)和四肢痛(1.2%)很少见。 3/4级中性粒细胞减少和发热性中性粒细胞减少分别发生在4名(1.6%)和3名(1.2%)患者中。严重的不良事件包括呕吐(2.8%)和发热(2%)。没有发现新的安全隐患。五例死亡中没有一个与Peg-grafeel ?有关。结论:Peg-grafeel ?的总体安全性与临床环境中晚期恶性肿瘤患者的预期使用的Pegfilgrastim安全性一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号