首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Science >Cultural differences and confidence in institutions: Comparing Africa and the USA
【24h】

Cultural differences and confidence in institutions: Comparing Africa and the USA

机译:文化差异和对机构的信心:非洲和美国的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

A comparison was undertaken of confidence in 17 institutions in Ghana, Nigeria, Zimbabwe and the USA using data from the World Values Survey to find shared valuations and distinguishing characteristics as markers of cultural categories. Frequencies and rankings were examined and exploratory factor analysis was used to find plausible meanings of groups of institutions. The findings show that, although African respondents score institutions higher than their US counterparts, the rankings vary. With frequencies, the meaning is manifest. The analysis shows that 10 institutions load similarly on one latent variable and their combinations with the others indicate culture-specific characteristics. The latent variables were named ‘not-for-profit’, ‘for-profit’, ‘political’, ‘watchdog or fourth estate’ and ‘social order’ and they show Ghana is closer to the USA than to Nigeria, which is closer to Zimbabwe. The ‘not-for-profit’ variable is more important in the USA and Ghana and ‘political’ is more important in Nigeria and Zimbabwe. Institutional-specific loadings show that whereas the police and courts are grouped as ‘political’ in Nigeria, in other countries they belong to ‘social order’; and while universities are perceived as ‘for-profit’ in Africa, they are ‘not-for-profit’ in the USA. Comparing frequencies and rankings or dividing along the lines of individualistic versus collective or private and public sectors, masks the dynamic distribution of the systems of meaning in the local cultures; the latent variables approach therefore offers a more conceptually sound categorisation informed by shared and distinguishing institutions.Significance:? Nigerians, as at the time of the survey, were yet to perceive the principles of separation of powers between political institutions, the judiciary and the police – an essential feature of a good democracy and a characteristic of other countries in the study. Zimbabweans and Nigerians perceive their public institutions in generally the same way with the domination of the political establishments while Ghanaians are closer to the USA in terms of the values they attach to their establishments with the most important group being the charities. The universities in Africa, as well as the civil service in Nigeria, are associated with business/profit centres with the Nigerian labour movement also seen as political. The army also remains relevant as a part of the fourth estate in Ghana and Nigeria.
机译:使用世界价值调查的数据,对加纳,尼日利亚,津巴布韦和美国的17个机构进行了信心比较,以发现共同的估值并区分不同的特征作为文化类别的标志。检查频率和等级,并使用探索性因素分析来找出机构群体的合理含义。调查结果表明,尽管非洲受访者给机构的评分高于美国同行,但排名却有所不同。对于频率,其含义是显而易见的。分析表明,十个机构对一个潜变量的负荷相似,而它们与其他潜变量的组合则表明了特定于文化的特征。潜在变量被命名为“非营利”,“营利”,“政治”,“看门狗或第四产业”和“社会秩序”,它们表明加纳距离美国更近,而距离尼日利亚更近。去津巴布韦。在美国和加纳,“非营利”变量更为重要,在尼日利亚和津巴布韦,“政治”变量更为重要。特定于机构的数据显示,虽然在尼日利亚警察和法院被归类为“政治”,但在其他国家,它们属于“社会秩序”;虽然大学在非洲被视为“营利性”,但在美国却被视为“非营利性”。比较频率和等级,或按照个人主义与集体或私人和公共部门的划分,掩盖了当地文化中意义系统的动态分布;因此,潜在变量方法在共享和区分机构的指导下提供了概念上更合理的分类。截至调查时,尼日利亚人尚未意识到政治机构,司法机构和警察之间的三权分立原则-良好民主的基本特征和研究中其他国家的特征。津巴布韦人和尼日利亚人对政治机构的控制大致上与对政治机构的支配方式相同,而加纳人对机构的重视程度则更接近美国,其中最重要的群体是慈善机构。非洲的大学以及尼日利亚的公务员制度都与商业/利润中心相关联,而尼日利亚的劳工运动也被视为政治活动。作为加纳和尼日利亚第四产业的一部分,军队也仍然具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号