首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Medical Imaging >Systematic Evaluation of Current Possibilities to Determine Left Ventricular Volumes by Echocardiography in Patients after Myocardial Infarction
【24h】

Systematic Evaluation of Current Possibilities to Determine Left Ventricular Volumes by Echocardiography in Patients after Myocardial Infarction

机译:系统评价当前的可能性,通过超声心动图确定心肌梗死患者的左室容量

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) with current echocardiographic methods of planimetry for analysis of LV remodeling after myocardial infarction in daily clinical routine. Methods: 26 patients were investigated directly after interventional therapy at hospital pre-discharge and at 6 month follow-up. Standardized 2D transthoracic native and contrast echocardiography were performed in all patients. Due to methodological aspects the results of LV volumes and LVEF using native echocardiography were compared to the results of LV opacification (LVO) imaging for analysis in mono-, bi- and triplane data sets using the Simpson’s rule. In addition corresponding multidimensional data sets were analyzed. Results: The assessment of LV volumes and LVEF is more accurate with contrast echocardiography. The comparison of LV volumes and LVEF shows significant increases using contrast echocardiography (p < 0.001). Larger left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (LVEDV) are measured at follow up (p < 0.05). Significant differences (p < 0.001) are found for the determination of LVEDV and LVEF relating to apical mono-, bi-, tri- and multiplane data sets. Standard deviations of the triplane approach, however, are significantly lower than using other modalities. Conclusion: Depending on the localization of the myocardial infarction LV volumes and LVEF are less reliably evaluated using the mono- or biplane approach. According to standardization and simultaneous acquisition of all LV wall segments the triplane approach is currently the best approach to determine LV systolic function. In addition, contrast echocardiography is indicated to improve endocardial border delineation in patients using the triplane or multiplane approach. To our knowledge the present study is the first systematic evaluation of all current possibilities for determination of LV volumes and LVEF by native and contrast echocardiography.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估使用超声心动图的现有超声心动图法定量分析左心室(LV)体积和左室射血分数(LVEF)的诊断准确性,该方法可用于日常临床心肌梗死后的左室重构。方法:对26例患者在出院前和随访6个月后直接进行干预治疗。所有患者均进行标准化的2D经胸自然超声和对比超声心动图检查。由于方法方面的原因,将使用自然超声心动图的LV容积和LVEF的结果与使用Simpson规则在单平面,双平面和三平面数据集中进行分析的LV透明化(LVO)成像的结果进行了比较。另外,分析了相应的多维数据集。结果:对比超声心动图评估左室容量和左室射血分数更准确。使用对比超声心动图,LV体积和LVEF的比较显示显着增加(p <0.001)。随访时测量到较大的左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)(p <0.05)。发现与顶端单平面,双平面,三平面和多平面数据集相关的LVEDV和LVEF的测定存在显着差异(p <0.001)。但是,三翼飞机方法的标准偏差明显低于其他方式。结论:根据心肌梗塞的位置,使用单平面或双平面方法不太可靠地评估LV量和LVEF。根据所有左室壁节段的标准化和同步采集,三平面法目前是确定左室收缩功能的最佳方法。此外,使用三平面或多平面方法,对比超声心动图可改善患者的心内膜边界轮廓。据我们所知,本研究是对当前所有通过自然超声和对比超声心动图测定左室容量和左室射血分数的可能性的系统评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号