...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >Airway management in patients with maxillofacial trauma – A retrospective study of 177 cases
【24h】

Airway management in patients with maxillofacial trauma – A retrospective study of 177 cases

机译:颌面外伤患者的气道处理-177例回顾性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: Airway management in maxillofacial injuries presents with a unique set of problems. Compromised airway is still a challenge to the anesthesiologist in spite of all modalities available. Maxillofacial injuries are the result of high-velocity trauma arising from road traffic accidents, sport injuries, falls and gunshot wounds. Any flaw in airway management may lead to grave morbidity and mortality in prehospital or hospital settings and as well as for reconstruction of fractures subsequently. Methods: One hundred and seventy-seven patients of maxillofacial injuries, operated over a period of one and half years during July 2008 to December 2009 in Al-Nahdha hospital were reviewed. All patients were reviewed in depth with age related type of injury, etiology and techniques of difficult airway management. Results: The major etiology of injuries were road traffic accidents (67%) followed by sport (15%) and fall (15%). Majority of patients were young in the age group of 11-30 years (71 %). Fracture mandible (53%) was the most common injury, followed by fracture maxilla (21%), fracture zygoma (19%) and pan-facial fractures (6%). Maxillofacial injuries compromise mask ventilation and difficult airway due to facial fractures, tissue edema and deranged anatomy. Shared airway with the surgeon needs special attention due to restrictions imposed during surgery. Several methods available for securing the airway, both decision-making and performance, are important in such circumstances. Airway secured by nasal intubation with direct visualization of vocal cords was the most common (57%), followed by oral intubation (17%). Other methods like tracheostomy and blind nasal intubation was avoided by fiberoptic bronchoscopic nasal intubation in 26% of patients. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that surgically securing the airway by tracheostomy should be revised compared to other available methods. In the era of rigid fixation of fractures and the possibility of leaving the patient without wiring an open mouth and alternative techniques like fiberoptic bronchoscopic intubation, it is unnecessary to carry out tracheostomy for securing the airway as frequently as in the past.
机译:背景:颌面部损伤中的气道管理存在一系列独特的问题。尽管有各种可用的方式,但是气道受损仍然是麻醉医师面临的挑战。上颌面伤害是道路交通事故,运动伤害,跌倒和枪伤造成的高速创伤的结果。气道管理中的任何缺陷都可能导致院前或医院环境中严重的发病率和死亡率,以及随后的骨折重建。方法:回顾了2008年7月至2009年12月在Al-Nahdha医院接受了为期一年半的手术的177例颌面部损伤患者。所有患者均接受了与年龄相关的损伤类型,病因和困难气道管理技术的深入研究。结果:受伤的主要病因是道路交通事故(67%),运动(15%),跌倒(15%)。大多数患者年龄在11-30岁之间(71%)。下颌骨骨折(53%)是最常见的损伤,其次是上颌骨骨折(21%),zy骨瘤(19%)和泛面部骨折(6%)。由于面部骨折,组织水肿和解剖结构混乱,颌面部受伤会损害面罩通气和困难的气道。由于手术期间施加的限制,需要特别注意与外科医生共用气道。在这种情况下,有几种方法可以确保气道的安全,包括决策和性能。最常见的是通过鼻插管直接观察声带而固定的气道(57%),其次是口腔插管(17%)。纤维支气管镜鼻腔插管避免了其他方法,例如气管切开术和盲式鼻腔插管,占26%的患者。结论:这项研究的结果表明,与其他可用方法相比,应通过气管切开术通过外科手术固定气道。在骨折的刚性固定时代中,有可能在没有张开嘴巴的情况下离开患者以及使用诸如纤维支气管镜插管的替代技术,无需像过去那样频繁地进行气管造口术以固定气道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号