首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Utilizing Pacific Methodologies as Inclusive Practice
【24h】

Utilizing Pacific Methodologies as Inclusive Practice

机译:利用太平洋方法论作为包容性实践

获取原文
       

摘要

For academics embarking on research with Pacific people for the benefit of Pacific communities or issues, what is paramount is the need for Pacific methodologies to be adopted as well as adapted, to improve communication and rapport with prospective participants. When one thinks of research of a Pacific nature, it is not until existing Pacific methodologies are known that one ponders on the type of methodology best suits onea??s research practice. Since Smitha??s research on the importance for the decolonization process to be more at the fore regarding research undertaken about, for, and with indigenous groups, there has been a growing shift away from Eurocentric frameworks. Movement away enables improved understanding and communication with Pacific people and issues; it also confirms the appropriateness of Pacific methodologies to enhance research in general. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has similar elements found in Pacific methodologies; positive outcomes between both researcher and stakeholders are key during planning and implementation stages. By working alongside community partners, researchers work toward implementing research data collection and collation methods with the assistance of indigenous (in this case, Pacific experts and leaders of Pacific communities) to benefit and a??advance social change and social justice (Holkup et al., 2004; Minkler, 2004; Petrucka et al., 2012; Walters et al., 2009).a?? It may be time consuming at research commencement stage, but worthwhile pursuing to ensure all stakeholders involved in the research are aware of expectations and benefit from the outcomes of research pursued.
机译:对于为了太平洋社区或问题的利益而与太平洋人一起开展研究的学者,最重要的是需要采用和适应太平洋方法,以改善与潜在参与者的沟通和融洽关系。当人们想到太平洋性质的研究时,直到知道现有的太平洋方法论之后,人们才开始思考最适合自己的研究实践的方法论类型。自从史密莎(Smitha)对非殖民化过程的重要性的研究在有关土著群体,针对土著群体以及与土著群体进行的研究中脱颖而出之后,人们越来越偏离欧洲中心框架。迁走可以增进与太平洋人民和问题的理解和沟通;它还证实了太平洋方法论总体上增强研究的适当性。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)在太平洋方法论中也有类似的发现。在计划和实施阶段,研究人员和利益相关者之间的积极成果至关重要。通过与社区合作伙伴一起工作,研究人员致力于在土著人(在本例中为太平洋专家和太平洋社区领导人)的协助下实施研究数据收集和整理方法,以造福和推进社会变革和社会正义(Holkup等人) ; 2004; Minkler,2004; Petrucka等,2012; Walters等,2009)。在研究开始阶段可能会很耗时,但是有必要确保所有参与研究的利益相关者都意识到期望并从研究成果中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号