首页> 外文期刊>Sao Paulo Medical Journal >Non-invasive brain stimulation and computational models in post-stroke aphasic patients: single session of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. A randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Non-invasive brain stimulation and computational models in post-stroke aphasic patients: single session of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. A randomized clinical trial

机译:脑卒中后失语症患者的非侵入性脑刺激和计算模型:单次经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激。一项随机临床试验

获取原文
       

摘要

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing the same neuromodulation protocol may present different responses. Computational models may help in understanding such differences. The aims of this study were, firstly, to compare the performance of aphasic patients in naming tasks before and after one session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and sham, and analyze the results between these neuromodulation techniques; and secondly, through computational model on the cortex and surrounding tissues, to assess current flow distribution and responses among patients who received tDCS and presented different levels of results from naming tasks. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, descriptive, qualitative and quantitative, double blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study conducted at Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de S?o Paulo. METHODS: Patients with aphasia received one session of tDCS, TMS or sham stimulation. The time taken to name pictures and the response time were evaluated before and after neuromodulation. Selected patients from the first intervention underwent a computational model stimulation procedure that simulated tDCS. RESULTS: The results did not indicate any statistically significant differences from before to after the stimulation.The computational models showed different current flow distributions. CONCLUSIONS: The present study did not show any statistically significant difference between tDCS, TMS and sham stimulation regarding naming tasks. The patients’responses to the computational model showed different patterns of current distribution.
机译:摘要背景和目的:接受相同神经调节方案的患者可能会出现不同的反应。计算模型可能有助于理解这种差异。这项研究的目的是,首先,比较无力患者在一次经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),经颅磁刺激(TMS)和假手术之前和之后的命名任务中的表现,并分析这些神经调节技术之间的结果;其次,通过对皮层和周围组织的计算模型,评估接受tDCS并提出不同命名结果结果的患者之间当前的血流分布和反应。设计与地点:在圣保罗圣保罗大教堂的Facculdade deCiênciasMédicasda Santa Casa de S?o Paulo进行的前瞻性,描述性,定性和定量,双盲,随机和安慰剂对照研究。方法:失语症患者接受tDCS,TMS或假刺激刺激治疗。在神经调节之前和之后评估命名图片所花费的时间和响应时间。从第一次干预中选择的患者接受了模拟tDCS的计算模型刺激程序。结果:刺激前后之间没有统计学差异,计算模型显示出不同的电流分布。结论:本研究在命名任务方面,tDCS,TMS和假刺激之间没有统计学上的显着差异。患者对计算模型的反应显示出不同的电流分布模式。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号